PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLON vs. UPRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLON vs. UPRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Solana ETF (SLON) and ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLON achieves a -74.87% return, which is significantly lower than UPRO's 26.96% return.


SLON

1D
2.15%
1M
-17.19%
6M
-61.81%
YTD
-74.87%
1Y
-90.51%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-89.53%

UPRO

1D
4.31%
1M
3.94%
6M
21.04%
YTD
26.96%
1Y
60.49%
3Y*
46.49%
5Y*
20.10%
10Y*
28.55%
ALL TIME*
33.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$656.95K$744.85K$1.18M
$303.16M$293.07M$361.38M

SLON vs. UPRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
SLON
ProShares Ultra Solana ETF
-74.87%-62.89%
UPRO
ProShares UltraPro S&P 500
26.96%23.66%

Correlation

The correlation between SLON and UPRO is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLON vs. UPRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SLON
SLON Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
SLON Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLON Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLON Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
SLON Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLON Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

UPRO
UPRO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
UPRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UPRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
UPRO Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
UPRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
UPRO Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SLON vs. UPRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Solana ETF (SLON) and ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SLONUPRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

1.27

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.94

2.27

-3.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.17

8.68

-9.85

SLON vs. UPRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLON Sharpe Ratio is -0.63, which is lower than the UPRO Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLON and UPRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SLON vs. UPRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLON drawdown since its inception was -96.31%, which is greater than UPRO's maximum drawdown of -76.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLON and UPRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLONUPRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.31%

-76.82%

-19.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-96.31%

-26.78%

-69.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-95.28%

-2.80%

-92.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-68.45%

-14.34%

-54.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

77.28%

6.99%

+70.29%

Volatility

SLON vs. UPRO - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Solana ETF (SLON) has a higher volatility of 21.26% compared to ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO) at 11.49%. This indicates that SLON's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UPRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLONUPRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.26%

11.49%

+9.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

101.03%

30.61%

+70.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

144.71%

38.43%

+106.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

144.49%

50.74%

+93.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

144.49%

53.81%

+90.68%

SLON vs. UPRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLON has a 2.14% expense ratio, which is higher than UPRO's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

SLON vs. UPRO - Dividend Comparison

SLON's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.84%, more than UPRO's 0.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SLON
ProShares Ultra Solana ETF
22.84%5.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UPRO
ProShares UltraPro S&P 500
0.74%0.84%0.93%0.74%0.52%0.06%0.11%0.41%0.63%0.00%0.12%0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


SLON and UPRO have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLON has higher volatility (21.26%) compared to UPRO (11.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLON dropped -96.31% vs UPRO's -76.82%.

On 1-year performance, UPRO leads with 60.49% vs -90.51% for SLON. On fees, UPRO is cheaper at 0.89% per year. On volatility, UPRO has been the lower-risk option at 11.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, UPRO has performed better with a 60.49% return vs -90.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UPRO is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 2.14% for SLON.

SLON has the higher dividend yield at 22.84%, compared with 0.74% for UPRO.

SLON is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while UPRO is Leveraged Equities. SLON tracks Bloomberg Solana Index, while UPRO tracks S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 2.14% for SLON and 0.89% for UPRO.

UPRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLON and UPRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer