SLON vs. TQQQ
SLON (ProShares Ultra Solana ETF) and TQQQ (ProShares UltraPro QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - SLON is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Solana Index, while TQQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). Both are passively managed. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SLON charges 2.14%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TQQQ.
Performance
SLON vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLON achieves a -74.41% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 64.46% return.
SLON
- 1D
- -9.37%
- 1M
- -30.10%
- YTD
- -74.41%
- 6M
- -81.15%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TQQQ
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 33.35%
- YTD
- 64.46%
- 6M
- 55.93%
- 1Y
- 137.89%
- 3Y*
- 69.49%
- 5Y*
- 28.37%
- 10Y*
- 45.33%
SLON vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SLON ProShares Ultra Solana ETF | -74.41% | -62.58% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 64.46% | 24.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLON and TQQQ is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLON vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
SLON
TQQQ
SLON vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Solana ETF (SLON) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLON | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.92 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.63 | 0.74 | -1.37 |
Drawdowns
SLON vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLON drawdown since its inception was -95.19%, which is greater than TQQQ's maximum drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLON and TQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLON | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.19% | -81.66% | -13.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -36.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -58.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -81.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -81.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.19% | -0.76% | -94.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.84% | -18.52% | -45.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 11.28% | — |
Volatility
SLON vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLON | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 13.29% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 36.04% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 146.78% | 47.60% | +99.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 146.78% | 66.53% | +80.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 146.78% | 65.96% | +80.82% |
SLON vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLON has a 2.14% expense ratio, which is higher than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLON vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison
SLON's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.44%, more than TQQQ's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLON ProShares Ultra Solana ETF | 22.44% | 5.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 0.36% | 0.65% | 1.27% | 1.26% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLON and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TQQQ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TQQQ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 2.14% for SLON.
SLON has the higher dividend yield at 22.44%, compared with 0.36% for TQQQ.
SLON is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while TQQQ is Leveraged Equities. SLON tracks Bloomberg Solana Index, while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 2.14% for SLON and 0.95% for TQQQ.
Find the right allocation for SLON and TQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer