SLON vs. TQQQ
SLON (ProShares Ultra Solana ETF) and TQQQ (ProShares UltraPro QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - SLON is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Solana Index, while TQQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). Both are passively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SLON charges 2.14%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TQQQ.
Performance
SLON vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLON achieves a -77.64% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 41.43% return.
SLON
- 1D
- -11.08%
- 1M
- -37.46%
- YTD
- -77.64%
- 6M
- -77.86%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TQQQ
- 1D
- -9.86%
- 1M
- -4.37%
- YTD
- 41.43%
- 6M
- 35.75%
- 1Y
- 100.69%
- 3Y*
- 58.02%
- 5Y*
- 21.47%
- 10Y*
- 45.48%
SLON vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SLON ProShares Ultra Solana ETF | -77.64% | -62.89% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 41.43% | 24.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLON and TQQQ is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLON vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
SLON
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TQQQ
SLON vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Solana ETF (SLON) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLON | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.30 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.74 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.72 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLON vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLON drawdown since its inception was -96.31%, which is greater than TQQQ's maximum drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLON and TQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLON | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.31% | -81.66% | -14.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -36.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -58.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -81.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -81.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.80% | -14.65% | -81.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.32% | -18.49% | -46.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 11.59% | — |
Volatility
SLON vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLON | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 27.27% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 43.35% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 148.14% | 53.39% | +94.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 148.14% | 67.41% | +80.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 148.14% | 66.32% | +81.82% |
SLON vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLON has a 2.14% expense ratio, which is higher than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLON vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison
SLON's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.68%, more than TQQQ's 0.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLON ProShares Ultra Solana ETF | 25.68% | 5.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 0.42% | 0.65% | 1.27% | 1.26% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLON and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TQQQ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TQQQ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 2.14% for SLON.
SLON has the higher dividend yield at 25.68%, compared with 0.42% for TQQQ.
SLON is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while TQQQ is Leveraged Equities. SLON tracks Bloomberg Solana Index, while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 2.14% for SLON and 0.95% for TQQQ.
Find the right allocation for SLON and TQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer