PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLON vs. TQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLON vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Solana ETF (SLON) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLON achieves a -74.41% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 64.46% return.


SLON

1D
-9.37%
1M
-30.10%
YTD
-74.41%
6M
-81.15%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TQQQ

1D
-0.76%
1M
33.35%
YTD
64.46%
6M
55.93%
1Y
137.89%
3Y*
69.49%
5Y*
28.37%
10Y*
45.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLON vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
SLON
ProShares Ultra Solana ETF
-74.41%-62.58%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
64.46%24.61%

Correlation

The correlation between SLON and TQQQ is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025

0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLON vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLON

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLON vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Solana ETF (SLON) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SLON vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SLONTQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.63

0.74

-1.37

Drawdowns

SLON vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLON drawdown since its inception was -95.19%, which is greater than TQQQ's maximum drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLON and TQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLONTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.19%

-81.66%

-13.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-95.19%

-0.76%

-94.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.84%

-18.52%

-45.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.28%

Volatility

SLON vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLONTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

146.78%

47.60%

+99.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

146.78%

66.53%

+80.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

146.78%

65.96%

+80.82%

SLON vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLON has a 2.14% expense ratio, which is higher than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

SLON vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

SLON's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.44%, more than TQQQ's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SLON
ProShares Ultra Solana ETF
22.44%5.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.36%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


SLON and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TQQQ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TQQQ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 2.14% for SLON.

SLON has the higher dividend yield at 22.44%, compared with 0.36% for TQQQ.

SLON is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while TQQQ is Leveraged Equities. SLON tracks Bloomberg Solana Index, while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 2.14% for SLON and 0.95% for TQQQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLON and TQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer