SLON vs. IBLC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SLON (ProShares Ultra Solana ETF) and IBLC (iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds - SLON tracks the Bloomberg Solana Index while IBLC tracks the ICE FactSet Global Blockchain Technologies Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SLON charges 2.14%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for IBLC.

Performance

SLON vs. IBLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Solana ETF (SLON) and iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLON achieves a -74.41% return, which is significantly lower than IBLC's 32.34% return.

SLON

• 1D: -9.37%
• 1M: -30.10%
• YTD: -74.41%
• 6M: -81.15%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBLC

• 1D: -3.00%
• 1M: 13.52%
• YTD: 32.34%
• 6M: 15.25%
• 1Y: 73.27%
• 3Y*: 48.31%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLON vs. IBLC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SLON ProShares Ultra Solana ETF	-74.41%	-62.58%
IBLC iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF	32.34%	3.36%

Correlation

The correlation between SLON and IBLC is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025	0.64

Return for Risk

SLON vs. IBLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBLC

IBLC Risk / Return Rank: 33
IBLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
IBLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
IBLC Omega Ratio Rank: 33
IBLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
IBLC Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLON vs. IBLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Solana ETF (SLON) and iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SLON	IBLC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.34	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.63	0.40	-1.03

Drawdowns

SLON vs. IBLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLON drawdown since its inception was -95.19%, which is greater than IBLC's maximum drawdown of -62.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLON and IBLC.

Drawdown Indicators

	SLON	IBLC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.19%	-62.54%	-32.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-44.94%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-51.68%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-95.19%	-12.99%	-82.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-63.84%	-25.89%	-37.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	22.56%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SLON	IBLC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	14.67%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	40.76%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	146.78%	54.94%	+91.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	146.78%	64.49%	+82.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	146.78%	64.49%	+82.29%

SLON vs. IBLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLON has a 2.14% expense ratio, which is higher than IBLC's 0.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

SLON vs. IBLC - Dividend Comparison

SLON's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.44%, more than IBLC's 4.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
IBLC iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF	4.77%	6.31%	1.60%	1.79%	0.84%
SLON ProShares Ultra Solana ETF	22.44%	5.74%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SLON and IBLC in my portfolio?

SLON and IBLC have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SLON or IBLC?

On fees, IBLC is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SLON or IBLC?

IBLC is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 2.14% for SLON.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SLON or IBLC?

SLON has the higher dividend yield at 22.44%, compared with 4.77% for IBLC.

What is the main difference between SLON and IBLC?

SLON tracks Bloomberg Solana Index, while IBLC tracks ICE FactSet Global Blockchain Technologies Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 2.14% for SLON and 0.47% for IBLC.