PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLON vs. CLIP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLON vs. CLIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Solana ETF (SLON) and Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLON achieves a -74.41% return, which is significantly lower than CLIP's 1.50% return.


SLON

1D
-9.37%
1M
-30.10%
YTD
-74.41%
6M
-81.15%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CLIP

1D
0.01%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.50%
6M
1.82%
1Y
3.96%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLON vs. CLIP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
SLON
ProShares Ultra Solana ETF
-74.41%-62.58%
CLIP
Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
1.50%1.94%

Correlation

The correlation between SLON and CLIP is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025

-0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLON vs. CLIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLON

CLIP
CLIP Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
CLIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLIP Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
CLIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLIP Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLON vs. CLIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Solana ETF (SLON) and Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SLON vs. CLIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SLONCLIPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.63

10.71

-11.34

Drawdowns

SLON vs. CLIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLON drawdown since its inception was -95.19%, which is greater than CLIP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLON and CLIP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLONCLIPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.19%

-0.08%

-95.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-95.19%

0.00%

-95.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.84%

-0.00%

-63.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

Volatility

SLON vs. CLIP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLONCLIPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

146.78%

0.23%

+146.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

146.78%

0.44%

+146.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

146.78%

0.44%

+146.34%

SLON vs. CLIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLON has a 2.14% expense ratio, which is higher than CLIP's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

SLON vs. CLIP - Dividend Comparison

SLON's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.44%, more than CLIP's 3.91% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
CLIP
Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
3.91%4.14%5.11%2.75%
SLON
ProShares Ultra Solana ETF
22.44%5.74%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SLON and CLIP have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CLIP is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CLIP is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 2.14% for SLON.

SLON has the higher dividend yield at 22.44%, compared with 3.91% for CLIP.

SLON is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CLIP is Ultrashort Bond. SLON tracks Bloomberg Solana Index, while CLIP tracks Solactive 1-3 month US T-Bill Index - USD. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 2.14% for SLON and 0.07% for CLIP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLON and CLIP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer