SLON vs. BITC
SLON (ProShares Ultra Solana ETF) and BITC (Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. SLON is passively managed, while BITC is actively managed. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SLON charges 2.14%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for BITC.
Performance
SLON vs. BITC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLON achieves a -77.64% return, which is significantly lower than BITC's 3.58% return.
SLON
- 1D
- -11.08%
- 1M
- -37.46%
- YTD
- -77.64%
- 6M
- -77.86%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BITC
- 1D
- -3.33%
- 1M
- -3.10%
- YTD
- 3.58%
- 6M
- 3.49%
- 1Y
- -13.86%
- 3Y*
- 28.98%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SLON vs. BITC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SLON ProShares Ultra Solana ETF | -77.64% | -62.89% |
BITC Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF | 3.58% | -25.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLON and BITC is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLON vs. BITC — Risk / Return Rank
SLON
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BITC
SLON vs. BITC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Solana ETF (SLON) and Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLON | BITC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.90 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.52 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.73 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLON vs. BITC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLON drawdown since its inception was -96.31%, which is greater than BITC's maximum drawdown of -38.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLON and BITC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLON | BITC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.31% | -38.51% | -57.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -26.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -38.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.80% | -28.82% | -66.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.32% | -16.51% | -48.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 18.94% | — |
Volatility
SLON vs. BITC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLON | BITC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.42% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 19.00% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 148.14% | 25.12% | +123.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 148.14% | 46.29% | +101.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 148.14% | 46.29% | +101.85% |
SLON vs. BITC - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLON has a 2.14% expense ratio, which is higher than BITC's 0.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLON vs. BITC - Dividend Comparison
SLON's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.68%, more than BITC's 3.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BITC Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF | 3.25% | 3.36% | 42.68% | 5.82% |
SLON ProShares Ultra Solana ETF | 25.68% | 5.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLON and BITC have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BITC is cheaper at 0.88% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BITC is cheaper with a 0.88% expense ratio, compared with 2.14% for SLON.
SLON has the higher dividend yield at 25.68%, compared with 3.25% for BITC.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Bitwise. Their fees differ too: 2.14% for SLON and 0.88% for BITC.
Find the right allocation for SLON and BITC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer