SLON vs. BITC
SLON (ProShares Ultra Solana ETF) and BITC (Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. SLON is passively managed, while BITC is actively managed. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SLON charges 2.14%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for BITC.
Performance
SLON vs. BITC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLON achieves a -74.41% return, which is significantly lower than BITC's 6.98% return.
SLON
- 1D
- -9.37%
- 1M
- -30.10%
- YTD
- -74.41%
- 6M
- -81.15%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BITC
- 1D
- -0.00%
- 1M
- -4.31%
- YTD
- 6.98%
- 6M
- -1.22%
- 1Y
- -15.09%
- 3Y*
- 36.02%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SLON vs. BITC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SLON ProShares Ultra Solana ETF | -74.41% | -62.58% |
BITC Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF | 6.98% | -23.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLON and BITC is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLON vs. BITC — Risk / Return Rank
SLON
BITC
SLON vs. BITC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Solana ETF (SLON) and Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLON | BITC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.63 | 0.68 | -1.31 |
Drawdowns
SLON vs. BITC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLON drawdown since its inception was -95.19%, which is greater than BITC's maximum drawdown of -38.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLON and BITC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLON | BITC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.19% | -38.51% | -56.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -26.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -38.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.19% | -26.48% | -68.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.84% | -16.37% | -47.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 18.37% | — |
Volatility
SLON vs. BITC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLON | BITC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.39% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 19.98% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 146.78% | 25.54% | +121.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 146.78% | 46.65% | +100.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 146.78% | 46.65% | +100.13% |
SLON vs. BITC - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLON has a 2.14% expense ratio, which is higher than BITC's 0.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLON vs. BITC - Dividend Comparison
SLON's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.44%, more than BITC's 3.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BITC Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF | 3.14% | 3.36% | 42.68% | 5.82% |
SLON ProShares Ultra Solana ETF | 22.44% | 5.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLON and BITC have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BITC is cheaper at 0.88% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BITC is cheaper with a 0.88% expense ratio, compared with 2.14% for SLON.
SLON has the higher dividend yield at 22.44%, compared with 3.14% for BITC.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Bitwise. Their fees differ too: 2.14% for SLON and 0.88% for BITC.
Find the right allocation for SLON and BITC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer