SLON vs. BCDF
SLON (ProShares Ultra Solana ETF) and BCDF (Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. SLON is passively managed, while BCDF is actively managed. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SLON charges 2.14%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for BCDF.
Performance
SLON vs. BCDF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLON achieves a -74.41% return, which is significantly lower than BCDF's 3.23% return.
SLON
- 1D
- -9.37%
- 1M
- -30.10%
- YTD
- -74.41%
- 6M
- -81.15%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BCDF
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -4.70%
- YTD
- 3.23%
- 6M
- 4.02%
- 1Y
- 6.26%
- 3Y*
- 14.97%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SLON vs. BCDF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SLON ProShares Ultra Solana ETF | -74.41% | -62.58% |
BCDF Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF | 3.23% | 0.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLON and BCDF is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLON vs. BCDF — Risk / Return Rank
SLON
BCDF
SLON vs. BCDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Solana ETF (SLON) and Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLON | BCDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.63 | 0.39 | -1.03 |
Drawdowns
SLON vs. BCDF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLON drawdown since its inception was -95.19%, which is greater than BCDF's maximum drawdown of -27.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLON and BCDF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLON | BCDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.19% | -27.70% | -67.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.63% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.19% | -7.63% | -87.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.84% | -9.83% | -54.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.39% | — |
Volatility
SLON vs. BCDF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLON | BCDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.17% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.03% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 146.78% | 14.76% | +132.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 146.78% | 16.94% | +129.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 146.78% | 16.94% | +129.84% |
SLON vs. BCDF - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLON has a 2.14% expense ratio, which is higher than BCDF's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLON vs. BCDF - Dividend Comparison
SLON's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.44%, more than BCDF's 2.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCDF Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF | 2.45% | 2.53% | 1.63% | 0.69% | 0.38% |
SLON ProShares Ultra Solana ETF | 22.44% | 5.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLON and BCDF have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BCDF is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BCDF is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 2.14% for SLON.
SLON has the higher dividend yield at 22.44%, compared with 2.45% for BCDF.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Horizon. Their fees differ too: 2.14% for SLON and 0.85% for BCDF.
Find the right allocation for SLON and BCDF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer