SLON vs. AMLP
SLON (ProShares Ultra Solana ETF) and AMLP (Alerian MLP ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SLON is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Solana Index, while AMLP is a MLPs fund tracking the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. SLON charges 2.14%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for AMLP.
Performance
SLON vs. AMLP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLON achieves a -73.75% return, which is significantly lower than AMLP's 18.74% return.
SLON
- 1D
- -7.63%
- 1M
- 21.56%
- 6M
- -79.21%
- YTD
- -73.75%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMLP
- 1D
- 1.88%
- 1M
- 2.99%
- 6M
- 15.34%
- YTD
- 18.74%
- 1Y
- 19.21%
- 3Y*
- 19.54%
- 5Y*
- 18.25%
- 10Y*
- 6.74%
SLON vs. AMLP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SLON ProShares Ultra Solana ETF | -73.75% | -62.89% |
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF | 18.74% | 0.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLON and AMLP is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLON vs. AMLP — Risk / Return Rank
SLON
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AMLP
SLON vs. AMLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Solana ETF (SLON) and Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLON | AMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.27 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.16 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.04 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLON vs. AMLP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLON drawdown since its inception was -96.31%, which is greater than AMLP's maximum drawdown of -77.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLON and AMLP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLON | AMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.31% | -77.19% | -19.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.27% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -72.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.07% | -2.10% | -92.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.86% | -17.32% | -49.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.19% | — |
Volatility
SLON vs. AMLP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLON | AMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.24% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.62% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 147.87% | 12.50% | +135.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 147.87% | 19.69% | +128.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 147.87% | 27.65% | +120.22% |
SLON vs. AMLP - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLON has a 2.14% expense ratio, which is higher than AMLP's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLON vs. AMLP - Dividend Comparison
SLON's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.87%, more than AMLP's 7.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF | 7.49% | 8.36% | 7.70% | 7.86% | 7.70% | 8.55% | 12.31% | 9.12% | 9.29% | 7.97% | 8.09% | 9.84% |
SLON ProShares Ultra Solana ETF | 21.87% | 5.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLON and AMLP have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AMLP is cheaper at 0.90% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMLP is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 2.14% for SLON.
SLON has the higher dividend yield at 21.87%, compared with 7.49% for AMLP.
SLON is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while AMLP is MLPs. SLON tracks Bloomberg Solana Index, while AMLP tracks Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 2.14% for SLON and 0.90% for AMLP.
Find the right allocation for SLON and AMLP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer