SLNC.DE vs. CHPX
SLNC.DE (CoinShares FTX Physical Staked Solana EUR) and CHPX (Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SLNC.DE is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by CoinShares, while CHPX is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum Index. SLNC.DE is actively managed, while CHPX is passively managed. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SLNC.DE charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for CHPX.
Performance
SLNC.DE vs. CHPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SLNC.DE is traded in EUR, while CHPX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CHPX values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLNC.DE achieves a -42.42% return, which is significantly lower than CHPX's 77.76% return.
SLNC.DE
- 1D
- -5.24%
- 1M
- -20.26%
- YTD
- -42.42%
- 6M
- -46.70%
- 1Y
- -53.19%
- 3Y*
- 49.86%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CHPX
- 1D
- -9.44%
- 1M
- 11.01%
- YTD
- 77.76%
- 6M
- 71.54%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SLNC.DE vs. CHPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SLNC.DE CoinShares FTX Physical Staked Solana EUR | -42.42% | -43.22% |
CHPX Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF | 77.76% | 5.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLNC.DE and CHPX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLNC.DE vs. CHPX — Risk / Return Rank
SLNC.DE
CHPX
SLNC.DE vs. CHPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoinShares FTX Physical Staked Solana EUR (SLNC.DE) and Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF (CHPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SLNC.DE | CHPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.78 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.25 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLNC.DE | CHPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.85 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.06 | 3.92 | -3.98 |
Drawdowns
SLNC.DE vs. CHPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLNC.DE drawdown since its inception was -92.51%, which is greater than CHPX's maximum drawdown of -14.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLNC.DE and CHPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLNC.DE | CHPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.51% | -14.30% | -78.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -70.93% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -75.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -75.00% | -12.11% | -62.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.99% | -3.60% | -47.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 44.24% | — | — |
Volatility
SLNC.DE vs. CHPX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLNC.DE | CHPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.87% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.95% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 65.09% | 39.29% | +25.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 92.13% | 39.29% | +52.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 92.13% | 39.29% | +52.84% |
SLNC.DE vs. CHPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLNC.DE has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than CHPX's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLNC.DE vs. CHPX - Dividend Comparison
SLNC.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CHPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CHPX Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF | 0.03% | 0.06% |
SLNC.DE CoinShares FTX Physical Staked Solana EUR | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLNC.DE and CHPX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SLNC.DE is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SLNC.DE is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for CHPX.
SLNC.DE is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CHPX is Semiconductors. They also come from different issuers: CoinShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for SLNC.DE and 0.50% for CHPX.
Find the right allocation for SLNC.DE and CHPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer