PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLNC.DE vs. CETH.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SLNC.DE vs. CETH.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in CoinShares FTX Physical Staked Solana EUR (SLNC.DE) and CoinShares Physical Ethereum (ETH) (CETH.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SLNC.DE vs. CETH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SLNC.DE
CoinShares FTX Physical Staked Solana EUR
-31.33%-40.96%94.71%1,027.77%-89.44%
CETH.DE
CoinShares Physical Ethereum (ETH)
-27.34%-21.13%53.89%91.46%-59.46%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLNC.DE achieves a -31.33% return, which is significantly lower than CETH.DE's -27.34% return.


SLNC.DE

1D
2.39%
1M
-5.19%
YTD
-31.33%
6M
-61.01%
1Y
-37.71%
3Y*
59.99%
5Y*
10Y*

CETH.DE

1D
2.74%
1M
4.95%
YTD
-27.34%
6M
-50.04%
1Y
5.00%
3Y*
3.88%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SLNC.DE vs. CETH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLNC.DE has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than CETH.DE's 0.00% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

SLNC.DE vs. CETH.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLNC.DE
SLNC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
SLNC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLNC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLNC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
SLNC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLNC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

CETH.DE
CETH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
CETH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CETH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
CETH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
CETH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
CETH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLNC.DE vs. CETH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoinShares FTX Physical Staked Solana EUR (SLNC.DE) and CoinShares Physical Ethereum (ETH) (CETH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SLNC.DECETH.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.54

0.08

-0.62

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.47

0.59

-1.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.07

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.56

0.10

-0.65

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.07

0.20

-1.27

SLNC.DE vs. CETH.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLNC.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.54, which is lower than the CETH.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLNC.DE and CETH.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SLNC.DECETH.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.54

0.08

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.02

-0.06

+0.04

Correlation

The correlation between SLNC.DE and CETH.DE is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

SLNC.DE vs. CETH.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SLNC.DE nor CETH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

SLNC.DE vs. CETH.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLNC.DE drawdown since its inception was -92.51%, which is greater than CETH.DE's maximum drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLNC.DE and CETH.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SLNC.DECETH.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.51%

-76.74%

-15.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-68.41%

-60.73%

-7.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-70.19%

-55.60%

-14.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.20%

-42.52%

-7.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

35.68%

29.08%

+6.60%

Volatility

SLNC.DE vs. CETH.DE - Volatility Comparison

CoinShares FTX Physical Staked Solana EUR (SLNC.DE) and CoinShares Physical Ethereum (ETH) (CETH.DE) have volatilities of 16.79% and 17.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SLNC.DECETH.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.79%

17.48%

-0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

48.83%

45.49%

+3.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

69.66%

65.40%

+4.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

93.52%

68.36%

+25.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

93.52%

68.36%

+25.16%