SLMCX vs. FAGAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund (SLMCX) and Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class A (FAGAX).
SLMCX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Jun 22, 1983. FAGAX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 3, 1996.
Performance
SLMCX vs. FAGAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SLMCX vs. FAGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLMCX Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund | 0.17% | 37.32% | 26.67% | 44.27% | -31.14% | 38.97% | 44.45% | 54.15% | -8.12% | 34.08% |
FAGAX Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class A | -13.66% | 22.17% | 38.71% | 45.14% | -38.40% | 11.31% | 68.60% | 40.26% | 14.87% | 34.66% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLMCX achieves a 0.17% return, which is significantly higher than FAGAX's -13.66% return. Over the past 10 years, SLMCX has outperformed FAGAX with an annualized return of 22.20%, while FAGAX has yielded a comparatively lower 18.64% annualized return.
SLMCX
- 1D
- -2.99%
- 1M
- -9.33%
- YTD
- 0.17%
- 6M
- 5.15%
- 1Y
- 58.16%
- 3Y*
- 29.27%
- 5Y*
- 16.53%
- 10Y*
- 22.20%
FAGAX
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- -9.95%
- YTD
- -13.66%
- 6M
- -12.33%
- 1Y
- 18.39%
- 3Y*
- 22.90%
- 5Y*
- 7.34%
- 10Y*
- 18.64%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SLMCX vs. FAGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLMCX has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than FAGAX's 1.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SLMCX vs. FAGAX — Risk / Return Rank
SLMCX
FAGAX
SLMCX vs. FAGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund (SLMCX) and Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class A (FAGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SLMCX | FAGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.90 | 0.75 | +1.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.46 | 1.19 | +1.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.17 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.54 | 0.93 | +2.61 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.44 | 3.40 | +10.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLMCX | FAGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.90 | 0.75 | +1.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | 0.30 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 | 0.79 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.45 | +0.24 |
Correlation
The correlation between SLMCX and FAGAX is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SLMCX vs. FAGAX - Dividend Comparison
SLMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.44%, more than FAGAX's 4.76% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLMCX Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund | 9.44% | 9.45% | 14.27% | 5.16% | 9.42% | 11.75% | 10.40% | 11.44% | 12.33% | 11.15% | 8.19% | 10.79% |
FAGAX Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class A | 4.76% | 4.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 10.19% | 5.45% | 4.10% | 11.99% | 7.67% | 15.44% | 11.12% |
Drawdowns
SLMCX vs. FAGAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLMCX drawdown since its inception was -68.10%, roughly equal to the maximum FAGAX drawdown of -65.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLMCX and FAGAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLMCX | FAGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.10% | -65.24% | -2.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.88% | -16.19% | +1.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.32% | -44.70% | +7.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.32% | -44.70% | +7.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.96% | -16.19% | +4.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.05% | -15.27% | +2.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.93% | 4.43% | -0.50% |
Volatility
SLMCX vs. FAGAX - Volatility Comparison
Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund (SLMCX) has a higher volatility of 9.50% compared to Fidelity Advisor Growth Opportunities Fund Class A (FAGAX) at 6.78%. This indicates that SLMCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SLMCX | FAGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.50% | 6.78% | +2.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.01% | 14.04% | +6.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.59% | 24.01% | +6.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.96% | 24.80% | +1.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.93% | 23.78% | +2.15% |