SLJY vs. USO
SLJY (Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF) and USO (United States Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - SLJY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify, while USO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. SLJY is actively managed, while USO is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.19, they often move in opposite directions. SLJY charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for USO.
Performance
SLJY vs. USO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLJY achieves a 7.71% return, which is significantly lower than USO's 103.67% return.
SLJY
- 1D
- -4.01%
- 1M
- 3.34%
- YTD
- 7.71%
- 6M
- 15.56%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USO
- 1D
- 2.62%
- 1M
- -4.57%
- YTD
- 103.67%
- 6M
- 99.35%
- 1Y
- 101.55%
- 3Y*
- 29.98%
- 5Y*
- 24.41%
- 10Y*
- 4.07%
SLJY vs. USO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SLJY Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF | 7.71% | 43.38% |
USO United States Oil Fund LP | 103.67% | -4.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLJY and USO is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025 | -0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLJY vs. USO — Risk / Return Rank
SLJY
USO
SLJY vs. USO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF (SLJY) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLJY | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.10 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.49 | -0.18 | +1.67 |
Drawdowns
SLJY vs. USO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLJY drawdown since its inception was -30.60%, smaller than the maximum USO drawdown of -98.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLJY and USO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLJY | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.60% | -98.19% | +67.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -20.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -36.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -86.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.65% | -85.01% | +63.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.60% | -75.30% | +65.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 10.82% | — |
Volatility
SLJY vs. USO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLJY | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 14.87% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 38.23% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.59% | 44.20% | +5.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.59% | 36.06% | +13.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.59% | 39.00% | +10.59% |
SLJY vs. USO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLJY has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than USO's 0.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLJY vs. USO - Dividend Comparison
SLJY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.71%, while USO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
SLJY Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF | 16.71% | 6.26% |
USO United States Oil Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLJY and USO have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SLJY is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SLJY is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for USO.
SLJY has the higher dividend yield at 16.71%, compared with 0.00% for USO.
SLJY is categorized as Derivative Income, while USO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SLJY and 0.86% for USO.
Find the right allocation for SLJY and USO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer