SLJY vs. CNBS

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF (SLJY) and Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF (CNBS).

SLJY and CNBS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SLJY is an actively managed fund by Amplify. It was launched on Aug 18, 2025. CNBS is an actively managed fund by Amplify. It was launched on Jul 23, 2019.

Performance

SLJY vs. CNBS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF (SLJY) and Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF (CNBS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SLJY vs. CNBS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SLJY Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF	11.19%	43.38%
CNBS Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF	-19.71%	4.73%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLJY achieves a 11.19% return, which is significantly higher than CNBS's -19.71% return.

SLJY

• 1D: 2.62%
• 1M: -18.20%
• YTD: 11.19%
• 6M: 29.48%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CNBS

• 1D: 3.35%
• 1M: 1.68%
• YTD: -19.71%
• 6M: -25.83%
• 1Y: 34.54%
• 3Y*: -12.81%
• 5Y*: -37.62%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLJY vs. CNBS - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SLJY and CNBS have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

SLJY

Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF

CNBS

Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF

Return for Risk

SLJY vs. CNBS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNBS

CNBS Risk / Return Rank: 31
CNBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
CNBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
CNBS Omega Ratio Rank: 39
CNBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
CNBS Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLJY vs. CNBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF (SLJY) and Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF (CNBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SLJY	CNBS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.34	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.60	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.23	-0.46	+2.68

Correlation

The correlation between SLJY and CNBS is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

SLJY vs. CNBS - Dividend Comparison

SLJY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.71%, while CNBS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
SLJY Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF	11.71%	6.26%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CNBS Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF	0.00%	0.00%	43.54%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.58%	0.58%

Drawdowns

SLJY vs. CNBS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLJY drawdown since its inception was -30.60%, smaller than the maximum CNBS drawdown of -95.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLJY and CNBS.

Drawdown Indicators

	SLJY	CNBS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.60%	-95.71%	+65.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-51.25%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-94.21%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.12%	-93.00%	+73.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.89%	-70.74%	+63.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	25.95%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SLJY	CNBS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	22.14%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	75.61%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	51.14%	101.71%	-50.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.14%	62.86%	-11.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	51.14%	60.38%	-9.24%