PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLJY vs. AIEQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLJY vs. AIEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF (SLJY) and Amplify AI Powered Equity ETF (AIEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLJY achieves a -4.62% return, which is significantly lower than AIEQ's 8.03% return.


SLJY

1D
-4.03%
1M
-10.47%
YTD
-4.62%
6M
-7.86%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AIEQ

1D
-1.27%
1M
-1.14%
YTD
8.03%
6M
7.07%
1Y
19.15%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLJY vs. AIEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
SLJY
Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF
-4.62%42.11%
AIEQ
Amplify AI Powered Equity ETF
8.03%3.16%

Correlation

The correlation between SLJY and AIEQ is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025

0.45

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLJY vs. AIEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLJY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


AIEQ
AIEQ Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
AIEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
AIEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLJY vs. AIEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF (SLJY) and Amplify AI Powered Equity ETF (AIEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SLJYAIEQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.00

SLJY vs. AIEQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SLJY vs. AIEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLJY drawdown since its inception was -32.40%, which is greater than AIEQ's maximum drawdown of -24.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLJY and AIEQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLJYAIEQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.40%

-24.19%

-8.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.62%

-2.85%

-27.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.64%

-3.28%

-7.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.40%

Volatility

SLJY vs. AIEQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLJYAIEQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.39%

12.87%

+37.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.39%

19.47%

+30.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.39%

19.47%

+30.92%

SLJY vs. AIEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SLJY and AIEQ have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

SLJY vs. AIEQ - Dividend Comparison

SLJY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.88%, more than AIEQ's 0.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
AIEQ
Amplify AI Powered Equity ETF
0.40%0.43%0.65%
SLJY
Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF
18.88%6.26%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SLJY and AIEQ have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SLJY and AIEQ have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

SLJY has the higher dividend yield at 18.88%, compared with 0.40% for AIEQ.

SLJY is categorized as Derivative Income, while AIEQ is Large Cap Growth Equities.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLJY and AIEQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer