SLJY vs. ACYS

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

SLJY (Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF) and ACYS (FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

SLJY vs. ACYS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF (SLJY) and FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF (ACYS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SLJY

• 1D: -3.80%
• 1M: -14.97%
• 6M: -22.59%
• YTD: -10.42%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ACYS

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 0.51%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLJY vs. ACYS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
SLJY Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF	-20.47%
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF	2.15%

Correlation

The correlation between SLJY and ACYS is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2026	0.32

Return for Risk

SLJY vs. ACYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF (SLJY) and FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF (ACYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

SLJY vs. ACYS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLJY drawdown since its inception was -34.84%, which is greater than ACYS's maximum drawdown of -0.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLJY and ACYS.

Drawdown Indicators

	SLJY	ACYS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.84%	-0.63%	-34.21%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-34.84%	-0.10%	-34.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.13%	-0.14%	-11.99%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SLJY	ACYS	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.68%	3.38%	+46.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.68%	3.38%	+46.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.68%	3.38%	+46.30%

SLJY vs. ACYS - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SLJY and ACYS have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

SLJY vs. ACYS - Dividend Comparison

SLJY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.72%, more than ACYS's 0.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF	0.60%	0.00%
SLJY Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF	22.72%	6.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SLJY and ACYS in my portfolio?

SLJY and ACYS have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SLJY or ACYS?

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SLJY or ACYS?

SLJY and ACYS have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SLJY or ACYS?

SLJY has the higher dividend yield at 22.72%, compared with 0.60% for ACYS.

What is the main difference between SLJY and ACYS?

They also come from different issuers: Amplify and First Trust.