SLG vs. KRC
SLG (SL Green Realty Corp.) and KRC (Kilroy Realty Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the REIT - Office industry within the Real Estate sector. Over the past 10 years, SLG returned -3.04%/yr vs -1.65%/yr for KRC. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
SLG vs. KRC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLG achieves a 0.13% return, which is significantly higher than KRC's -4.71% return. Over the past 10 years, SLG has underperformed KRC with an annualized return of -3.04%, while KRC has yielded a comparatively higher -1.65% annualized return.
SLG
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 5.34%
- YTD
- 0.13%
- 6M
- -2.32%
- 1Y
- -17.68%
- 3Y*
- 31.15%
- 5Y*
- -5.53%
- 10Y*
- -3.04%
KRC
- 1D
- 2.74%
- 1M
- 3.83%
- YTD
- -4.71%
- 6M
- -14.40%
- 1Y
- 15.20%
- 3Y*
- 14.76%
- 5Y*
- -8.86%
- 10Y*
- -1.65%
SLG vs. KRC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLG SL Green Realty Corp. | 0.13% | -29.03% | 58.26% | 48.75% | -50.94% | 22.86% | -29.14% | 20.96% | -18.80% | -3.25% |
KRC Kilroy Realty Corporation | -4.71% | -2.00% | 7.81% | 10.09% | -39.25% | 19.30% | -29.18% | 36.76% | -13.54% | 4.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLG and KRC is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 1997 | 0.67 |
The correlation between SLG and KRC shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (all time) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SLG:
-$2.05
KRC:
$2.32
SLG:
3.48
KRC:
3.73
SLG:
$993.51M
KRC:
$1.11B
SLG:
$662.81M
KRC:
$745.51M
SLG:
$547.76M
KRC:
$808.51M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLG vs. KRC — Risk / Return Rank
SLG
KRC
SLG vs. KRC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SL Green Realty Corp. (SLG) and Kilroy Realty Corporation (KRC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SLG | KRC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.48 | 0.55 | -1.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.47 | 0.95 | -1.41 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.11 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.37 | 0.44 | -0.81 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.63 | 0.93 | -1.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLG | KRC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.48 | 0.55 | -1.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.13 | -0.26 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.07 | -0.05 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.19 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
SLG vs. KRC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLG drawdown since its inception was -94.02%, which is greater than KRC's maximum drawdown of -81.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLG and KRC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLG | KRC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.02% | -81.27% | -12.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.40% | -35.32% | -10.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.91% | -35.32% | -18.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -74.47% | -64.91% | -9.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.70% | -66.55% | -11.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.66% | -45.94% | +3.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.43% | -23.41% | -4.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.58% | 16.54% | +10.04% |
Volatility
SLG vs. KRC - Volatility Comparison
SL Green Realty Corp. (SLG) has a higher volatility of 10.61% compared to Kilroy Realty Corporation (KRC) at 8.29%. This indicates that SLG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KRC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLG | KRC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.61% | 8.29% | +2.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.82% | 21.92% | +5.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.24% | 27.59% | +9.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.54% | 33.89% | +9.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.23% | 31.55% | +10.68% |
Dividends
SLG vs. KRC - Dividend Comparison
SLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, less than KRC's 6.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KRC Kilroy Realty Corporation | 6.18% | 5.78% | 5.34% | 5.42% | 5.48% | 3.07% | 3.43% | 2.28% | 2.85% | 2.21% | 4.61% | 2.21% |
SLG SL Green Realty Corp. | 4.79% | 6.18% | 4.43% | 7.15% | 10.94% | 5.09% | 7.81% | 3.74% | 4.16% | 3.11% | 2.73% | 2.23% |
Financials
SLG vs. KRC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SL Green Realty Corp. and Kilroy Realty Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SLG vs. KRC - Profitability Comparison
SLG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SL Green Realty Corp. reported a gross profit of 211.17M and revenue of 253.08M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 83.4%.
KRC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kilroy Realty Corporation reported a gross profit of 181.91M and revenue of 272.22M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.8%.
SLG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SL Green Realty Corp. reported an operating income of 188.38M and revenue of 253.08M, resulting in an operating margin of 74.4%.
KRC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kilroy Realty Corporation reported an operating income of 67.76M and revenue of 272.22M, resulting in an operating margin of 24.9%.
SLG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SL Green Realty Corp. reported a net income of -84.39M and revenue of 253.08M, resulting in a net margin of -33.4%.
KRC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kilroy Realty Corporation reported a net income of 12.42M and revenue of 272.22M, resulting in a net margin of 4.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SLG and KRC have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLG has higher volatility (10.61%) compared to KRC (8.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLG dropped -94.02% vs KRC's -81.27%.
KRC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.55 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLG and KRC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer