PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLF vs. SDCI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLF vs. SDCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sun Life Financial Inc. (SLF) and USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLF achieves a 29.79% return, which is significantly higher than SDCI's 24.88% return.


SLF

1D
-0.64%
1M
7.98%
6M
29.05%
YTD
29.79%
1Y
33.16%
3Y*
21.33%
5Y*
14.26%
10Y*
14.30%

SDCI

1D
1.66%
1M
-0.58%
6M
22.81%
YTD
24.88%
1Y
30.21%
3Y*
21.54%
5Y*
20.20%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLF vs. SDCI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SLF
Sun Life Financial Inc.
29.79%9.72%19.48%17.77%-12.89%29.71%1.55%42.69%-17.01%
SDCI
USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund
24.88%17.60%17.91%-0.88%33.23%36.52%-10.61%-2.36%-13.91%

Correlation

The correlation between SLF and SDCI is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2018

0.20

The correlation between SLF and SDCI shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLF vs. SDCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLF
SLF Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
SLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLF Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
SLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLF Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

SDCI
SDCI Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
SDCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDCI Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
SDCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDCI Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLF vs. SDCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sun Life Financial Inc. (SLF) and USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SLFSDCIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.30

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

2.75

+0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.25

8.78

-0.53

SLF vs. SDCI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLF Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the SDCI Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLF and SDCI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SLF vs. SDCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLF drawdown since its inception was -78.60%, which is greater than SDCI's maximum drawdown of -45.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLF and SDCI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLFSDCIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.60%

-45.79%

-32.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.06%

-11.03%

+0.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.91%

-11.96%

-2.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.77%

-18.55%

-12.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.64%

-6.08%

+5.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.83%

-11.54%

-5.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.03%

3.45%

+0.58%

Volatility

SLF vs. SDCI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sun Life Financial Inc. (SLF) is 3.77%, while USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund (SDCI) has a volatility of 4.88%. This indicates that SLF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SDCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLFSDCIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.77%

4.88%

-1.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.33%

14.62%

-0.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.69%

17.03%

+2.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.41%

18.40%

+1.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.67%

17.08%

+5.59%

Dividends

SLF vs. SDCI - Dividend Comparison

SLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, more than SDCI's 2.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SDCI
USCF SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Strategy No K-1 Fund
2.95%3.68%5.92%3.46%33.49%19.26%0.20%0.93%0.68%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SLF
Sun Life Financial Inc.
3.35%4.03%4.00%4.98%4.59%3.32%3.69%3.47%4.71%3.17%3.98%4.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


SLF and SDCI have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SDCI has higher volatility (4.88%) compared to SLF (3.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLF dropped -78.60% vs SDCI's -45.79%.

SDCI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLF and SDCI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer