SLF vs. BEN
SLF (Sun Life Financial Inc.) and BEN (Franklin Resources, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — SLF in Insurance - Diversified, BEN in Asset Management. Over the past 10 years, SLF returned 13.18%/yr vs 4.80%/yr for BEN. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SLF vs. BEN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLF achieves a 25.30% return, which is significantly lower than BEN's 36.46% return. Over the past 10 years, SLF has outperformed BEN with an annualized return of 13.18%, while BEN has yielded a comparatively lower 4.80% annualized return.
SLF
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- 7.59%
- YTD
- 25.30%
- 6M
- 29.43%
- 1Y
- 24.27%
- 3Y*
- 19.96%
- 5Y*
- 12.61%
- 10Y*
- 13.18%
BEN
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- 0.94%
- YTD
- 36.46%
- 6M
- 40.74%
- 1Y
- 53.22%
- 3Y*
- 11.89%
- 5Y*
- 3.39%
- 10Y*
- 4.80%
SLF vs. BEN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLF Sun Life Financial Inc. | 25.30% | 9.72% | 19.48% | 17.77% | -12.89% | 29.71% | 1.55% | 42.69% | -16.37% | 11.18% |
BEN Franklin Resources, Inc. | 36.46% | 24.76% | -27.21% | 16.96% | -17.52% | 38.88% | 1.46% | -9.29% | -23.34% | 11.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLF and BEN is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2000 | 0.49 |
The correlation between SLF and BEN shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.55 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SLF:
$30.85B
BEN:
$16.65B
SLF:
CA$6.22
BEN:
$1.57
SLF:
17.21
BEN:
20.46
SLF:
1.43
BEN:
1.84
SLF:
1.89
BEN:
1.37
SLF:
CA$39.40B
BEN:
$9.03B
SLF:
CA$20.48B
BEN:
$6.66B
SLF:
CA$4.74B
BEN:
$1.77B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLF vs. BEN — Risk / Return Rank
SLF
BEN
SLF vs. BEN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sun Life Financial Inc. (SLF) and Franklin Resources, Inc. (BEN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLF | BEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.31 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.55 | 2.63 | -1.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.34 | 6.61 | -3.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLF vs. BEN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLF drawdown since its inception was -78.60%, which is greater than BEN's maximum drawdown of -72.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLF and BEN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLF | BEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.60% | -72.80% | -5.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.91% | -19.21% | +4.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.91% | -40.01% | +25.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.77% | -47.43% | +16.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.84% | -62.10% | +11.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -7.84% | +7.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.86% | -22.87% | +6.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.90% | 7.63% | -0.73% |
Volatility
SLF vs. BEN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Sun Life Financial Inc. (SLF) is 4.82%, while Franklin Resources, Inc. (BEN) has a volatility of 8.96%. This indicates that SLF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BEN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLF | BEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.82% | 8.96% | -4.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.14% | 21.55% | -7.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.20% | 27.55% | -7.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.44% | 32.14% | -12.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.88% | 32.95% | -10.07% |
Dividends
SLF vs. BEN - Dividend Comparison
SLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%, less than BEN's 4.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BEN Franklin Resources, Inc. | 4.05% | 5.40% | 7.69% | 3.02% | 4.44% | 3.37% | 4.36% | 4.04% | 13.32% | 1.92% | 1.87% | 1.71% |
SLF Sun Life Financial Inc. | 3.47% | 4.03% | 4.00% | 4.98% | 4.59% | 3.32% | 3.69% | 3.47% | 4.71% | 3.17% | 3.98% | 4.64% |
Financials
SLF vs. BEN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sun Life Financial Inc. and Franklin Resources, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SLF vs. BEN - Profitability Comparison
SLF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sun Life Financial Inc. reported a gross profit of 8.88B and revenue of 8.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
BEN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Franklin Resources, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.21B and revenue of 2.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.8%.
SLF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sun Life Financial Inc. reported an operating income of 633.63M and revenue of 8.88B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.1%.
BEN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Franklin Resources, Inc. reported an operating income of 323.30M and revenue of 2.29B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.1%.
SLF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sun Life Financial Inc. reported a net income of 537.39M and revenue of 8.88B, resulting in a net margin of 6.1%.
BEN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Franklin Resources, Inc. reported a net income of 346.60M and revenue of 2.29B, resulting in a net margin of 15.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SLF and BEN have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BEN has higher volatility (8.96%) compared to SLF (4.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLF dropped -78.60% vs BEN's -72.80%.
BEN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLF and BEN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer