PortfoliosLab logo
BEN vs. FRT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between BEN and FRT is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

BEN vs. FRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Resources, Inc. (BEN) and Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BEN:

-0.23

FRT:

-0.22

Sortino Ratio

BEN:

0.05

FRT:

-0.18

Omega Ratio

BEN:

1.01

FRT:

0.98

Calmar Ratio

BEN:

-0.08

FRT:

-0.17

Martin Ratio

BEN:

-0.34

FRT:

-0.62

Ulcer Index

BEN:

13.23%

FRT:

8.78%

Daily Std Dev

BEN:

34.30%

FRT:

22.55%

Max Drawdown

BEN:

-72.80%

FRT:

-57.42%

Current Drawdown

BEN:

-43.19%

FRT:

-23.58%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BEN:

$11.00B

FRT:

$8.23B

EPS

BEN:

$0.69

FRT:

$3.48

PE Ratio

BEN:

30.35

FRT:

26.87

PEG Ratio

BEN:

0.47

FRT:

3.72

PS Ratio

BEN:

1.27

FRT:

6.70

PB Ratio

BEN:

0.87

FRT:

2.71

Total Revenue (TTM)

BEN:

$8.67B

FRT:

$1.22B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BEN:

$5.30B

FRT:

$734.78M

EBITDA (TTM)

BEN:

$1.26B

FRT:

$631.36M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BEN achieves a 4.95% return, which is significantly higher than FRT's -14.69% return. Over the past 10 years, BEN has underperformed FRT with an annualized return of -4.39%, while FRT has yielded a comparatively higher 0.26% annualized return.


BEN

YTD

4.95%

1M

18.17%

6M

2.80%

1Y

-6.23%

5Y*

6.32%

10Y*

-4.39%

FRT

YTD

-14.69%

1M

5.10%

6M

-16.48%

1Y

-4.17%

5Y*

8.99%

10Y*

0.26%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BEN vs. FRT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BEN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BEN is 4141
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BEN is 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BEN is 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BEN is 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BEN is 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BEN is 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

FRT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FRT is 3737
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FRT is 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FRT is 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FRT is 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FRT is 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FRT is 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BEN vs. FRT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Resources, Inc. (BEN) and Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current BEN Sharpe Ratio is -0.23, which is comparable to the FRT Sharpe Ratio of -0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BEN and FRT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

BEN vs. FRT - Dividend Comparison

BEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.02%, more than FRT's 4.70% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BEN
Franklin Resources, Inc.
6.02%7.69%3.02%4.44%3.37%4.36%4.04%13.32%1.92%1.87%1.71%1.82%
FRT
Federal Realty Investment Trust
4.70%2.93%4.21%4.26%3.12%4.96%3.22%3.42%2.98%2.70%2.48%2.47%

Drawdowns

BEN vs. FRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BEN drawdown since its inception was -72.80%, which is greater than FRT's maximum drawdown of -57.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEN and FRT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

BEN vs. FRT - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Resources, Inc. (BEN) has a higher volatility of 10.37% compared to Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) at 5.78%. This indicates that BEN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

BEN vs. FRT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Franklin Resources, Inc. and Federal Realty Investment Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20212022202320242025
2.11B
309.15M
(BEN) Total Revenue
(FRT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BEN vs. FRT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Franklin Resources, Inc. and Federal Realty Investment Trust over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20212022202320242025
47.8%
66.2%
(BEN) Gross Margin
(FRT) Gross Margin
BEN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Franklin Resources, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.01B and revenue of 2.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.8%.

FRT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Federal Realty Investment Trust reported a gross profit of 204.78M and revenue of 309.15M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.2%.

BEN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Franklin Resources, Inc. reported an operating income of 145.60M and revenue of 2.11B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.9%.

FRT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Federal Realty Investment Trust reported an operating income of 106.96M and revenue of 309.15M, resulting in an operating margin of 34.6%.

BEN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Franklin Resources, Inc. reported a net income of 151.40M and revenue of 2.11B, resulting in a net margin of 7.2%.

FRT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Federal Realty Investment Trust reported a net income of 63.77M and revenue of 309.15M, resulting in a net margin of 20.6%.