PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLF.TO vs. ARTG.V
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SLF.TO vs. ARTG.V - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Sun Life Financial Inc. (SLF.TO) and Artemis Gold Inc (ARTG.V). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLF.TO achieves a 27.45% return, which is significantly higher than ARTG.V's -7.90% return.


SLF.TO

1D
1.13%
1M
9.13%
YTD
27.45%
6M
31.31%
1Y
27.87%
3Y*
21.57%
5Y*
15.58%
10Y*
13.97%

ARTG.V

1D
4.94%
1M
-4.95%
YTD
-7.90%
6M
-9.29%
1Y
27.22%
3Y*
93.55%
5Y*
38.97%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLF.TO vs. ARTG.V - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SLF.TO
Sun Life Financial Inc.
27.45%4.75%29.69%14.37%-6.73%28.82%-0.52%2.34%
ARTG.V
Artemis Gold Inc
-7.90%166.84%117.56%43.96%-36.38%7.81%392.31%18.18%

Correlation

The correlation between SLF.TO and ARTG.V is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2019

0.10

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SLF.TO:

CA$59.94B

ARTG.V:

CA$8.10B

EPS

SLF.TO:

CA$5.82

ARTG.V:

CA$1.93

PE Ratio

SLF.TO:

18.39

ARTG.V:

17.54

PS Ratio

SLF.TO:

1.68

ARTG.V:

6.77

PB Ratio

SLF.TO:

2.63

ARTG.V:

7.15

Total Revenue (TTM)

SLF.TO:

CA$35.97B

ARTG.V:

CA$1.19B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SLF.TO:

CA$14.49B

ARTG.V:

CA$857.14M

EBITDA (TTM)

SLF.TO:

CA$4.74B

ARTG.V:

CA$857.89M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLF.TO vs. ARTG.V — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLF.TO
SLF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
SLF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
SLF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

ARTG.V
ARTG.V Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
ARTG.V Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARTG.V Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARTG.V Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
ARTG.V Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARTG.V Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLF.TO vs. ARTG.V - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sun Life Financial Inc. (SLF.TO) and Artemis Gold Inc (ARTG.V). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SLF.TOARTG.VDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.14

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

0.80

+1.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.54

2.05

+2.49

SLF.TO vs. ARTG.V - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLF.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is higher than the ARTG.V Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLF.TO and ARTG.V, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SLF.TO vs. ARTG.V - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLF.TO drawdown since its inception was -71.53%, which is greater than ARTG.V's maximum drawdown of -54.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLF.TO and ARTG.V.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLF.TOARTG.VDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.53%

-54.31%

-17.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.08%

-36.70%

+22.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.08%

-36.70%

+22.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.48%

-54.31%

+29.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-27.32%

+27.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.63%

-17.37%

+1.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.80%

14.23%

-8.43%

Volatility

SLF.TO vs. ARTG.V - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sun Life Financial Inc. (SLF.TO) is 4.43%, while Artemis Gold Inc (ARTG.V) has a volatility of 17.31%. This indicates that SLF.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARTG.V based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLF.TOARTG.VDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.43%

17.31%

-12.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.84%

38.43%

-24.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.51%

48.40%

-28.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.90%

51.41%

-34.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.44%

59.68%

-39.24%

Dividends

SLF.TO vs. ARTG.V - Dividend Comparison

SLF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, while ARTG.V has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARTG.V
Artemis Gold Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SLF.TO
Sun Life Financial Inc.
3.44%4.11%3.80%4.37%4.39%3.28%3.89%3.55%4.21%3.36%3.14%3.50%

Financials

SLF.TO vs. ARTG.V - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sun Life Financial Inc. and Artemis Gold Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-5.00B0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20222023202420252026
8.86B
315.38M
(SLF.TO) Total Revenue
(ARTG.V) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

SLF.TO vs. ARTG.V - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Sun Life Financial Inc. and Artemis Gold Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
100.0%
69.6%
Portfolio components
SLF.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sun Life Financial Inc. reported a gross profit of 8.86B and revenue of 8.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

ARTG.V - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Artemis Gold Inc reported a gross profit of 219.36M and revenue of 315.38M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.6%.

SLF.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sun Life Financial Inc. reported an operating income of 632.00M and revenue of 8.86B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.1%.

ARTG.V - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Artemis Gold Inc reported an operating income of 213.14M and revenue of 315.38M, resulting in an operating margin of 67.6%.

SLF.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sun Life Financial Inc. reported a net income of 536.00M and revenue of 8.86B, resulting in a net margin of 6.1%.

ARTG.V - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Artemis Gold Inc reported a net income of 114.20M and revenue of 315.38M, resulting in a net margin of 36.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SLF.TO and ARTG.V have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLF.TO and ARTG.V

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer