PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
SLF.TO vs. MFC.TO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


SLF.TOMFC.TO
YTD Return27.04%61.98%
1Y Return28.82%84.47%
3Y Return (Ann)11.00%28.13%
5Y Return (Ann)11.20%16.89%
10Y Return (Ann)11.79%11.87%
Sharpe Ratio2.224.39
Sortino Ratio2.976.22
Omega Ratio1.451.86
Calmar Ratio2.790.85
Martin Ratio7.1532.95
Ulcer Index4.71%2.57%
Daily Std Dev15.15%19.24%
Max Drawdown-71.53%-100.00%
Current Drawdown0.00%-99.99%

Fundamentals


SLF.TOMFC.TO
Market CapCA$48.10BCA$79.50B
EPSCA$6.16CA$2.84
PE Ratio13.5415.98
PEG Ratio1.260.91
Total Revenue (TTM)CA$49.97BCA$45.57B
Gross Profit (TTM)CA$34.79BCA$30.97B
EBITDA (TTM)CA$589.00MCA$125.00M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.7

The correlation between SLF.TO and MFC.TO is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

SLF.TO vs. MFC.TO - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, SLF.TO achieves a 27.04% return, which is significantly lower than MFC.TO's 61.98% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SLF.TO having a 11.79% annualized return and MFC.TO not far ahead at 11.87%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
19.86%
26.59%
SLF.TO
MFC.TO

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

SLF.TO vs. MFC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sun Life Financial Inc. (SLF.TO) and Manulife Financial Corporation (MFC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SLF.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SLF.TO, currently valued at 1.61, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.61
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for SLF.TO, currently valued at 2.21, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.21
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for SLF.TO, currently valued at 1.31, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.31
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for SLF.TO, currently valued at 1.90, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.90
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for SLF.TO, currently valued at 4.75, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.004.75
MFC.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MFC.TO, currently valued at 3.79, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.79
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MFC.TO, currently valued at 5.29, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.005.29
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MFC.TO, currently valued at 1.70, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.70
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MFC.TO, currently valued at 2.73, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.73
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MFC.TO, currently valued at 25.57, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0025.57

SLF.TO vs. MFC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLF.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is lower than the MFC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 4.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLF.TO and MFC.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.61
3.79
SLF.TO
MFC.TO

Dividends

SLF.TO vs. MFC.TO - Dividend Comparison

SLF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%, more than MFC.TO's 2.49% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
SLF.TO
Sun Life Financial Inc.
3.77%4.37%4.39%3.28%3.89%3.55%4.21%3.36%3.14%3.50%3.44%3.84%
MFC.TO
Manulife Financial Corporation
2.49%3.67%4.21%3.88%4.93%2.86%3.64%2.60%2.36%3.28%3.12%2.39%

Drawdowns

SLF.TO vs. MFC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLF.TO drawdown since its inception was -71.53%, smaller than the maximum MFC.TO drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLF.TO and MFC.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-14.00%-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember00
SLF.TO
MFC.TO

Volatility

SLF.TO vs. MFC.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sun Life Financial Inc. (SLF.TO) is 5.11%, while Manulife Financial Corporation (MFC.TO) has a volatility of 7.05%. This indicates that SLF.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MFC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.11%
7.05%
SLF.TO
MFC.TO

Financials

SLF.TO vs. MFC.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sun Life Financial Inc. and Manulife Financial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in CAD except per share items