ARTG.V vs. K.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Artemis Gold Inc (ARTG.V) and Kinross Gold Corporation (K.TO).

Performance

ARTG.V vs. K.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Artemis Gold Inc (ARTG.V) and Kinross Gold Corporation (K.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ARTG.V vs. K.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ARTG.V Artemis Gold Inc	2.89%	166.84%	117.56%	43.96%	-36.38%	7.81%	392.31%	30.00%
K.TO Kinross Gold Corporation	10.14%	191.81%	69.10%	49.15%	-22.64%	-19.94%	52.79%	-4.20%

Fundamentals

Market Cap ARTG.V : CA$9.00B K.TO : CA$51.40B
EPS ARTG.V : CA$1.47 K.TO : CA$1.97
PE Ratio ARTG.V : 25.69 K.TO : 21.64
PEG Ratio ARTG.V : 0.02 K.TO : 0.29
PS Ratio ARTG.V : 9.82 K.TO : 7.35
PB Ratio ARTG.V : 8.89 K.TO : 6.00
Total Revenue (TTM) ARTG.V : CA$913.94M K.TO : CA$7.06B
Gross Profit (TTM) ARTG.V : CA$669.62M K.TO : CA$3.48B
EBITDA (TTM) ARTG.V : CA$636.97M K.TO : CA$4.26B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARTG.V achieves a 2.89% return, which is significantly lower than K.TO's 10.14% return.

ARTG.V

• 1D: 4.86%
• 1M: -16.52%
• YTD: 2.89%
• 6M: 3.45%
• 1Y: 120.63%
• 3Y*: 103.49%
• 5Y*: 48.83%
• 10Y*: —

K.TO

• 1D: 6.78%
• 1M: -15.55%
• YTD: 10.14%
• 6M: 23.45%
• 1Y: 136.04%
• 3Y*: 91.09%
• 5Y*: 39.57%
• 10Y*: 26.42%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ARTG.V vs. K.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARTG.V

ARTG.V Risk / Return Rank: 91
ARTG.V Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
ARTG.V Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
ARTG.V Omega Ratio Rank: 87
ARTG.V Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
ARTG.V Martin Ratio Rank: 93

K.TO

K.TO Risk / Return Rank: 93
K.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
K.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
K.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 91
K.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
K.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARTG.V vs. K.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Artemis Gold Inc (ARTG.V) and Kinross Gold Corporation (K.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ARTG.V	K.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.37	2.77	-0.39
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.81	2.87	-0.07
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.41	-0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.15	4.65	-0.50
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.89	16.60	-2.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ARTG.V vs. K.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARTG.V Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the K.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARTG.V and K.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ARTG.V	K.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.37	2.77	-0.39
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96	0.96	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.58	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.26	0.09	+1.17

Correlation

The correlation between ARTG.V and K.TO is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ARTG.V vs. K.TO - Dividend Comparison

ARTG.V has not paid dividends to shareholders, while K.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ARTG.V Artemis Gold Inc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
K.TO Kinross Gold Corporation	0.44%	0.46%	1.24%	2.04%	2.83%	2.04%	0.85%

Drawdowns

ARTG.V vs. K.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARTG.V drawdown since its inception was -54.31%, smaller than the maximum K.TO drawdown of -95.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARTG.V and K.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	ARTG.V	K.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.31%	-95.68%	+41.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.90%	-29.96%	+0.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-54.31%	-58.77%	+4.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-68.19%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.80%	-17.99%	-0.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.17%	-66.08%	+48.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.93%	8.40%	+0.53%

Volatility

ARTG.V vs. K.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Artemis Gold Inc (ARTG.V) is 15.54%, while Kinross Gold Corporation (K.TO) has a volatility of 17.83%. This indicates that ARTG.V experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than K.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ARTG.V	K.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.54%	17.83%	-2.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	38.09%	39.93%	-1.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	51.18%	49.50%	+1.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.45%	41.76%	+9.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	59.83%	46.19%	+13.64%

Financials

ARTG.V vs. K.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Artemis Gold Inc and Kinross Gold Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

ARTG.V - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Artemis Gold Inc reported a gross profit of 238.66M and revenue of 333.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.5%.

K.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.08B and revenue of 2.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.4%.

ARTG.V - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Artemis Gold Inc reported an operating income of 234.93M and revenue of 333.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 70.4%.

K.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported an operating income of 985.01M and revenue of 2.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 48.0%.

ARTG.V - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Artemis Gold Inc reported a net income of 133.48M and revenue of 333.70M, resulting in a net margin of 40.0%.

K.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a net income of 920.43M and revenue of 2.05B, resulting in a net margin of 44.8%.