PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
SLF.TO vs. MRU.TO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


SLF.TOMRU.TO
YTD Return29.33%28.46%
1Y Return30.28%25.11%
3Y Return (Ann)11.75%11.58%
5Y Return (Ann)11.59%11.03%
10Y Return (Ann)11.92%14.20%
Sharpe Ratio2.101.04
Sortino Ratio2.771.45
Omega Ratio1.421.21
Calmar Ratio2.581.05
Martin Ratio6.615.89
Ulcer Index4.71%2.81%
Daily Std Dev14.80%16.02%
Max Drawdown-71.53%-47.50%
Current Drawdown0.00%-1.27%

Fundamentals


SLF.TOMRU.TO
Market CapCA$48.10BCA$19.52B
EPSCA$6.16CA$4.16
PE Ratio13.5421.08
PEG Ratio1.264.06
Total Revenue (TTM)CA$49.97BCA$16.28B
Gross Profit (TTM)CA$34.79BCA$2.90B
EBITDA (TTM)CA$589.00MCA$1.52B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between SLF.TO and MRU.TO is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

SLF.TO vs. MRU.TO - Performance Comparison

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SLF.TO having a 29.33% return and MRU.TO slightly lower at 28.46%. Over the past 10 years, SLF.TO has underperformed MRU.TO with an annualized return of 11.92%, while MRU.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 14.20% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
21.47%
13.61%
SLF.TO
MRU.TO

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

SLF.TO vs. MRU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sun Life Financial Inc. (SLF.TO) and Metro Inc. (MRU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SLF.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SLF.TO, currently valued at 1.71, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.71
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for SLF.TO, currently valued at 2.34, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.34
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for SLF.TO, currently valued at 1.32, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.32
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for SLF.TO, currently valued at 2.03, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.03
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for SLF.TO, currently valued at 5.06, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.005.06
MRU.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MRU.TO, currently valued at 0.80, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.80
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MRU.TO, currently valued at 1.19, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.19
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MRU.TO, currently valued at 1.15, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.15
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MRU.TO, currently valued at 0.91, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.91
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MRU.TO, currently valued at 4.23, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.004.23

SLF.TO vs. MRU.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLF.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is higher than the MRU.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLF.TO and MRU.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.71
0.80
SLF.TO
MRU.TO

Dividends

SLF.TO vs. MRU.TO - Dividend Comparison

SLF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%, more than MRU.TO's 1.57% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
SLF.TO
Sun Life Financial Inc.
3.70%4.37%4.39%3.28%3.89%3.55%4.21%3.36%3.14%3.50%3.44%3.84%
MRU.TO
Metro Inc.
1.57%1.75%1.49%1.49%1.62%1.49%1.52%1.61%1.39%1.20%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

SLF.TO vs. MRU.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLF.TO drawdown since its inception was -71.53%, which is greater than MRU.TO's maximum drawdown of -47.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLF.TO and MRU.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-14.00%-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember0
-3.22%
SLF.TO
MRU.TO

Volatility

SLF.TO vs. MRU.TO - Volatility Comparison

Sun Life Financial Inc. (SLF.TO) and Metro Inc. (MRU.TO) have volatilities of 5.21% and 5.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.21%
5.20%
SLF.TO
MRU.TO

Financials

SLF.TO vs. MRU.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sun Life Financial Inc. and Metro Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in CAD except per share items