PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLDAX vs. BAB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLDAX vs. BAB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional Investments Trust Long Duration Credit Fund (SLDAX) and Invesco Taxable Municipal Bond ETF (BAB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLDAX achieves a 0.58% return, which is significantly higher than BAB's 0.12% return. Over the past 10 years, SLDAX has underperformed BAB with an annualized return of 1.67%, while BAB has yielded a comparatively higher 2.24% annualized return.


SLDAX

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.97%
YTD
0.58%
6M
-0.13%
1Y
7.57%
3Y*
3.20%
5Y*
-2.71%
10Y*
1.67%

BAB

1D
0.19%
1M
-0.08%
YTD
0.12%
6M
0.14%
1Y
7.08%
3Y*
4.42%
5Y*
-0.29%
10Y*
2.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLDAX vs. BAB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SLDAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Long Duration Credit Fund
0.58%7.37%-2.78%8.14%-26.58%-2.80%16.56%21.45%-6.23%11.67%
BAB
Invesco Taxable Municipal Bond ETF
0.12%8.30%1.03%8.67%-19.50%1.00%9.11%10.85%0.93%9.87%

Correlation

The correlation between SLDAX and BAB is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2012

0.81

The correlation between SLDAX and BAB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLDAX vs. BAB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLDAX
SLDAX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
SLDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
SLDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

BAB
BAB Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
BAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAB Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
BAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAB Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLDAX vs. BAB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Investments Trust Long Duration Credit Fund (SLDAX) and Invesco Taxable Municipal Bond ETF (BAB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SLDAXBABDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.92

1.23

-0.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.36

1.89

-0.53

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.22

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.47

1.61

-0.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.72

4.61

-0.89

SLDAX vs. BAB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLDAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is comparable to the BAB Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLDAX and BAB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SLDAXBABDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

1.23

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.22

-0.04

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

0.23

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.52

-0.29

Drawdowns

SLDAX vs. BAB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLDAX drawdown since its inception was -36.12%, which is greater than BAB's maximum drawdown of -27.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLDAX and BAB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLDAXBABDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.12%

-27.80%

-8.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.19%

-4.15%

-1.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.62%

-7.57%

-6.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.17%

-24.95%

-10.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.12%

-27.80%

-8.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.82%

-5.64%

-14.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.62%

-5.31%

-5.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

1.45%

+0.60%

Volatility

SLDAX vs. BAB - Volatility Comparison

SEI Institutional Investments Trust Long Duration Credit Fund (SLDAX) has a higher volatility of 2.51% compared to Invesco Taxable Municipal Bond ETF (BAB) at 1.77%. This indicates that SLDAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLDAXBABDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.51%

1.77%

+0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.50%

3.79%

+1.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.67%

5.81%

+1.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.15%

8.34%

+3.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.27%

9.70%

+1.57%

SLDAX vs. BAB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLDAX has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than BAB's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

SLDAX vs. BAB - Dividend Comparison

SLDAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.13%, more than BAB's 4.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BAB
Invesco Taxable Municipal Bond ETF
4.10%3.96%3.97%3.65%3.40%2.63%2.96%3.77%4.20%3.96%4.26%4.71%
SLDAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Long Duration Credit Fund
5.13%5.03%4.63%3.38%3.27%5.81%7.64%3.79%4.26%4.41%4.22%6.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


SLDAX and BAB have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLDAX has higher volatility (2.51%) compared to BAB (1.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLDAX dropped -36.12% vs BAB's -27.80%.

BAB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLDAX and BAB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer