SLDAX vs. SBIFX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

SLDAX (SEI Institutional Investments Trust Long Duration Credit Fund) and SBIFX (Sextant Bond Income Fund) are both Long-Term Bond funds. Their correlation of 0.88 means they have usually moved in the same direction. SLDAX charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for SBIFX.

Performance

SLDAX vs. SBIFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional Investments Trust Long Duration Credit Fund (SLDAX) and Sextant Bond Income Fund (SBIFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SLDAX

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: -3.78%
• 6M: -3.34%
• YTD: -3.19%
• 1Y: -0.76%
• 3Y*: 1.59%
• 5Y*: -4.59%
• 10Y*: 0.82%
• ALL TIME*: 2.11%

SBIFX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
SLDAX SEI Institutional Investments Trust Long Duration Credit Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

SLDAX vs. SBIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SLDAX SEI Institutional Investments Trust Long Duration Credit Fund	-3.19%	7.37%	-2.78%	8.14%	-26.58%	-2.80%	16.56%	21.45%	-6.23%	11.67%
SBIFX Sextant Bond Income Fund	-0.81%	7.29%	-0.05%	5.30%	-17.54%	-2.37%	8.83%	10.24%	-1.13%	5.14%

Correlation

The correlation between SLDAX and SBIFX is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.64
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.89
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2012	0.88

Over the past year, the correlation between SLDAX and SBIFX has dropped to 0.64 - well below their long-term average of 0.88, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

SLDAX vs. SBIFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SLDAX

SLDAX Risk / Return Rank: 5
SLDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
SLDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
SLDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5
SLDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
SLDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6

SBIFX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SLDAX vs. SBIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Investments Trust Long Duration Credit Fund (SLDAX) and Sextant Bond Income Fund (SBIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SLDAX	SBIFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.10	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.19	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.13	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.30	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	SLDAX	SBIFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.12%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.70%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.80%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.17%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.12%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.82%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.73%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.38%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SLDAX	SBIFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.95%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.76%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.42%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.09%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.25%	—	—

SLDAX vs. SBIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLDAX has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than SBIFX's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

SLDAX vs. SBIFX - Dividend Comparison

SLDAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.91%, more than SBIFX's 2.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SBIFX Sextant Bond Income Fund	2.33%	3.57%	3.19%	2.60%	2.14%	2.33%	2.39%	2.86%	3.22%	3.04%	2.92%	3.30%
SLDAX SEI Institutional Investments Trust Long Duration Credit Fund	4.91%	5.03%	4.63%	3.38%	3.27%	5.81%	7.64%	3.79%	4.26%	4.41%	4.22%	6.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SLDAX and SBIFX in my portfolio?

SLDAX and SBIFX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.