PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLDAX vs. LDRAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLDAX vs. LDRAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional Investments Trust Long Duration Credit Fund (SLDAX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Long Duration Fund (LDRAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SLDAX having a 0.97% return and LDRAX slightly lower at 0.95%. Over the past 10 years, SLDAX has outperformed LDRAX with an annualized return of 1.69%, while LDRAX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.45% annualized return.


SLDAX

1D
0.39%
1M
1.89%
YTD
0.97%
6M
1.41%
1Y
6.58%
3Y*
3.16%
5Y*
-3.39%
10Y*
1.69%

LDRAX

1D
0.34%
1M
2.02%
YTD
0.95%
6M
1.39%
1Y
6.13%
3Y*
2.47%
5Y*
-3.91%
10Y*
1.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLDAX vs. LDRAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SLDAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Long Duration Credit Fund
0.97%7.37%-2.78%8.14%-26.58%-2.80%16.56%21.45%-6.23%11.67%
LDRAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Long Duration Fund
0.95%6.81%-3.28%7.16%-27.73%-2.19%18.23%21.19%-5.16%11.74%

Correlation

The correlation between SLDAX and LDRAX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2012

0.99

The correlation between SLDAX and LDRAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLDAX vs. LDRAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLDAX
SLDAX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
SLDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
SLDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

LDRAX
LDRAX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
LDRAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDRAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDRAX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
LDRAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDRAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLDAX vs. LDRAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Investments Trust Long Duration Credit Fund (SLDAX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Long Duration Fund (LDRAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SLDAXLDRAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.13

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

1.12

+0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.08

2.74

+0.34

SLDAX vs. LDRAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLDAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is comparable to the LDRAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLDAX and LDRAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SLDAX vs. LDRAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLDAX drawdown since its inception was -36.12%, roughly equal to the maximum LDRAX drawdown of -37.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLDAX and LDRAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLDAXLDRAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.12%

-37.23%

+1.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.19%

-5.34%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.62%

-14.49%

+0.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.17%

-36.35%

+1.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.12%

-37.23%

+1.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.50%

-22.10%

+2.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.64%

-12.41%

+1.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

2.18%

-0.08%

Volatility

SLDAX vs. LDRAX - Volatility Comparison

SEI Institutional Investments Trust Long Duration Credit Fund (SLDAX) has a higher volatility of 2.16% compared to SEI Institutional Investments Trust Long Duration Fund (LDRAX) at 2.02%. This indicates that SLDAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LDRAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLDAXLDRAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.16%

2.02%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.60%

5.69%

-0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.55%

7.87%

-0.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.13%

12.51%

-0.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.27%

11.40%

-0.13%

SLDAX vs. LDRAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SLDAX and LDRAX have an expense ratio of 0.14%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SLDAX vs. LDRAX - Dividend Comparison

SLDAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.11%, which matches LDRAX's 5.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LDRAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Long Duration Fund
5.13%5.04%4.62%3.42%3.23%4.30%12.32%8.60%4.80%4.46%6.21%9.23%
SLDAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Long Duration Credit Fund
5.11%5.03%4.63%3.38%3.27%5.81%7.64%3.79%4.26%4.41%4.22%6.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, SLDAX and LDRAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SLDAX has higher volatility (2.16%) compared to LDRAX (2.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLDAX dropped -36.12% vs LDRAX's -37.23%.

SLDAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLDAX and LDRAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer