BAB vs. GBAB
BAB (Invesco Taxable Municipal Bond ETF) is Municipal Bonds fund tracking the BofA Merrill Lynch Build America Bond Index, while GBAB (Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, BAB returned 2.15%/yr vs 2.94%/yr for GBAB. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BAB vs. GBAB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BAB achieves a 0.44% return, which is significantly higher than GBAB's -0.59% return. Over the past 10 years, BAB has underperformed GBAB with an annualized return of 2.15%, while GBAB has yielded a comparatively higher 2.94% annualized return.
BAB
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 1.15%
- YTD
- 0.44%
- 6M
- 0.52%
- 1Y
- 6.36%
- 3Y*
- 4.32%
- 5Y*
- -0.56%
- 10Y*
- 2.15%
GBAB
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- 2.27%
- YTD
- -0.59%
- 6M
- -1.12%
- 1Y
- 5.76%
- 3Y*
- 5.40%
- 5Y*
- -2.38%
- 10Y*
- 2.94%
BAB vs. GBAB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAB Invesco Taxable Municipal Bond ETF | 0.44% | 8.30% | 1.03% | 8.67% | -19.50% | 1.00% | 9.11% | 10.85% | 0.93% | 9.87% |
GBAB Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust | -0.59% | 8.38% | 2.86% | 8.57% | -25.10% | -0.92% | 14.69% | 15.16% | 3.50% | 13.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between BAB and GBAB is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2010 | 0.35 |
The correlation between BAB and GBAB shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (all time) to 0.46 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BAB vs. GBAB — Risk / Return Rank
BAB
GBAB
BAB vs. GBAB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Taxable Municipal Bond ETF (BAB) and Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust (GBAB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BAB | GBAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.10 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.54 | 0.58 | +0.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.14 | 1.65 | +2.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BAB vs. GBAB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BAB drawdown since its inception was -27.80%, smaller than the maximum GBAB drawdown of -35.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAB and GBAB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BAB | GBAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.80% | -35.81% | +8.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.15% | -9.98% | +5.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.57% | -17.29% | +9.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.95% | -35.81% | +10.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.80% | -35.81% | +8.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.34% | -13.94% | +8.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.31% | -8.30% | +2.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.54% | 3.50% | -1.96% |
Volatility
BAB vs. GBAB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Taxable Municipal Bond ETF (BAB) is 0.98%, while Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust (GBAB) has a volatility of 1.57%. This indicates that BAB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GBAB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BAB | GBAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.98% | 1.57% | -0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.75% | 8.53% | -4.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.67% | 11.32% | -5.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.31% | 14.63% | -6.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.70% | 14.97% | -5.27% |
Dividends
BAB vs. GBAB - Dividend Comparison
BAB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, less than GBAB's 10.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAB Invesco Taxable Municipal Bond ETF | 4.46% | 3.96% | 3.97% | 3.65% | 3.40% | 2.63% | 2.96% | 3.77% | 4.20% | 3.96% | 4.26% | 4.71% |
GBAB Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust | 10.71% | 10.11% | 9.93% | 9.32% | 9.22% | 6.36% | 5.92% | 6.37% | 6.88% | 6.64% | 7.51% | 7.78% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BAB and GBAB have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GBAB has higher volatility (1.57%) compared to BAB (0.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAB dropped -27.80% vs GBAB's -35.81%.
BAB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BAB and GBAB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer