SLANX vs. ILF
Compare and contrast key facts about DWS Latin America Equity Fund Class A (SLANX) and iShares Latin American 40 ETF (ILF).
SLANX is managed by DWS. It was launched on May 29, 2001. ILF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Latin America 40 Index. It was launched on Oct 25, 2001.
Performance
SLANX vs. ILF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SLANX vs. ILF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLANX DWS Latin America Equity Fund Class A | 7.80% | 54.13% | -28.52% | 33.24% | 8.08% | -9.06% | 0.70% | 35.56% | -2.82% | 32.20% |
ILF iShares Latin American 40 ETF | 16.65% | 52.65% | -23.11% | 33.14% | 9.81% | -13.59% | -11.71% | 13.77% | -6.85% | 26.33% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLANX achieves a 7.80% return, which is significantly lower than ILF's 16.65% return. Over the past 10 years, SLANX has outperformed ILF with an annualized return of 11.44%, while ILF has yielded a comparatively lower 8.47% annualized return.
SLANX
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -8.48%
- YTD
- 7.80%
- 6M
- 15.38%
- 1Y
- 45.04%
- 3Y*
- 15.30%
- 5Y*
- 10.40%
- 10Y*
- 11.44%
ILF
- 1D
- 4.41%
- 1M
- -2.63%
- YTD
- 16.65%
- 6M
- 25.92%
- 1Y
- 58.11%
- 3Y*
- 20.46%
- 5Y*
- 13.16%
- 10Y*
- 8.47%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SLANX vs. ILF - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLANX has a 1.51% expense ratio, which is higher than ILF's 0.48% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SLANX vs. ILF — Risk / Return Rank
SLANX
ILF
SLANX vs. ILF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS Latin America Equity Fund Class A (SLANX) and iShares Latin American 40 ETF (ILF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SLANX | ILF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.84 | 2.48 | -0.64 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.27 | 3.06 | -0.79 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.43 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.31 | 4.47 | -1.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.32 | 15.54 | -4.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLANX | ILF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.84 | 2.48 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.57 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.30 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.31 | +0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between SLANX and ILF is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SLANX vs. ILF - Dividend Comparison
SLANX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, more than ILF's 3.76% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLANX DWS Latin America Equity Fund Class A | 3.85% | 4.15% | 5.13% | 3.14% | 7.15% | 14.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.21% | 1.57% | 0.00% |
ILF iShares Latin American 40 ETF | 3.76% | 4.39% | 7.44% | 4.61% | 12.72% | 8.47% | 1.88% | 3.09% | 3.12% | 1.80% | 1.59% | 3.25% |
Drawdowns
SLANX vs. ILF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLANX drawdown since its inception was -70.73%, roughly equal to the maximum ILF drawdown of -67.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLANX and ILF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLANX | ILF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.73% | -67.48% | -3.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.85% | -12.67% | -0.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.92% | -29.71% | -0.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.91% | -57.79% | +6.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.63% | -4.82% | -4.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.43% | -24.07% | +0.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.75% | 3.65% | +0.10% |
Volatility
SLANX vs. ILF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DWS Latin America Equity Fund Class A (SLANX) is 10.49%, while iShares Latin American 40 ETF (ILF) has a volatility of 11.60%. This indicates that SLANX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ILF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SLANX | ILF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.49% | 11.60% | -1.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.93% | 17.90% | -0.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.11% | 23.59% | +0.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.14% | 23.24% | -0.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.01% | 28.59% | -1.58% |