SKYY vs. XLG
SKYY (First Trust ISE Cloud Computing Index Fund) and XLG (Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SKYY is a Technology Equities fund tracking the ISE Cloud Computing Index, while XLG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Top 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SKYY returned 16.26%/yr vs 16.96%/yr for XLG. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SKYY charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XLG.
Performance
SKYY vs. XLG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SKYY achieves a 3.03% return, which is significantly lower than XLG's 3.62% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SKYY having a 16.26% annualized return and XLG not far ahead at 16.96%.
SKYY
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 6.69%
- YTD
- 3.03%
- 6M
- 1.79%
- 1Y
- 13.95%
- 3Y*
- 20.38%
- 5Y*
- 5.69%
- 10Y*
- 16.26%
XLG
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -3.40%
- YTD
- 3.62%
- 6M
- 4.26%
- 1Y
- 21.79%
- 3Y*
- 22.23%
- 5Y*
- 15.12%
- 10Y*
- 16.96%
SKYY vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SKYY First Trust ISE Cloud Computing Index Fund | 3.03% | 9.20% | 35.87% | 52.18% | -44.68% | 10.62% | 57.77% | 25.25% | 6.01% | 33.47% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | 3.62% | 19.51% | 33.49% | 38.16% | -24.29% | 30.77% | 24.15% | 32.04% | -3.59% | 23.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between SKYY and XLG is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2011 | 0.78 |
The correlation between SKYY and XLG shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SKYY vs. XLG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SKYY
XLG
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
SKYY
XLG
Communication Services
SKYY
XLG
Consumer Cyclical
SKYY
XLG
Healthcare
SKYY
XLG
Industrials
SKYY
XLG
Basic Materials
SKYY
-
XLG
Consumer Defensive
SKYY
-
XLG
Energy
SKYY
-
XLG
Financial Services
SKYY
-
XLG
Real Estate
SKYY
-
XLG
-
Utilities
SKYY
-
XLG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SKYY vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank
SKYY
XLG
SKYY vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust ISE Cloud Computing Index Fund (SKYY) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SKYY | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.29 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.51 | 1.76 | -1.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.13 | 6.46 | -5.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SKYY vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SKYY drawdown since its inception was -53.20%, roughly equal to the maximum XLG drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SKYY and XLG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SKYY | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.20% | -52.39% | -0.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.39% | -12.41% | -14.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.80% | -20.70% | -11.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.20% | -28.02% | -25.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.20% | -30.46% | -22.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.63% | -5.06% | -8.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.90% | -7.64% | -3.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.34% | 3.38% | +8.96% |
Volatility
SKYY vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison
First Trust ISE Cloud Computing Index Fund (SKYY) has a higher volatility of 13.09% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) at 4.31%. This indicates that SKYY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SKYY | XLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.09% | 4.31% | +8.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.88% | 10.41% | +13.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.45% | 13.70% | +14.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.67% | 18.73% | +11.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.90% | 18.87% | +8.03% |
SKYY vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SKYY has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
SKYY vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison
SKYY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SKYY First Trust ISE Cloud Computing Index Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.23% | 0.78% | 0.17% | 0.54% | 0.37% | 0.27% | 0.35% | 0.41% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | 0.62% | 0.64% | 0.72% | 0.97% | 1.34% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.58% | 2.00% | 1.85% | 2.00% | 2.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SKYY and XLG have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SKYY has higher volatility (13.09%) compared to XLG (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SKYY dropped -53.20% vs XLG's -52.39%.
On 10-year performance, XLG leads with 16.96% vs 16.26% for SKYY. On fees, XLG is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, XLG has been the lower-risk option at 4.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLG has performed better with a 16.96% return vs 16.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLG is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SKYY.
XLG has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.00% for SKYY.
SKYY is categorized as Technology Equities, while XLG is S&P 500. SKYY tracks ISE Cloud Computing Index, while XLG tracks S&P 500 Top 50 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SKYY and 0.20% for XLG.
XLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SKYY and XLG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer