PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SKYW vs. LII
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SKYW vs. LII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SkyWest, Inc. (SKYW) and Lennox International Inc. (LII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SKYW achieves a -16.80% return, which is significantly lower than LII's 6.05% return. Over the past 10 years, SKYW has underperformed LII with an annualized return of 13.19%, while LII has yielded a comparatively higher 15.40% annualized return.


SKYW

1D
-1.07%
1M
-5.31%
YTD
-16.80%
6M
-19.19%
1Y
-19.09%
3Y*
34.98%
5Y*
11.40%
10Y*
13.19%

LII

1D
0.99%
1M
-1.50%
YTD
6.05%
6M
2.56%
1Y
-6.07%
3Y*
20.35%
5Y*
10.02%
10Y*
15.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SKYW vs. LII - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SKYW
SkyWest, Inc.
-16.80%0.28%91.82%216.17%-57.99%-2.51%-37.31%46.54%-15.60%46.83%
LII
Lennox International Inc.
6.05%-19.54%37.27%89.55%-24.94%19.71%13.79%12.78%6.33%37.43%

Correlation

The correlation between SKYW and LII is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 1999

0.37

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SKYW:

$3.40B

LII:

$17.97B

EPS

SKYW:

$10.42

LII:

$22.20

PE Ratio

SKYW:

8.02

LII:

23.13

PEG Ratio

SKYW:

0.04

LII:

1.41

PS Ratio

SKYW:

0.84

LII:

3.44

Total Revenue (TTM)

SKYW:

$4.12B

LII:

$5.26B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SKYW:

$1.73B

LII:

$1.74B

EBITDA (TTM)

SKYW:

$970.77M

LII:

$1.10B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SKYW vs. LII — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SKYW
SKYW Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
SKYW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SKYW Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
SKYW Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
SKYW Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
SKYW Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

LII
LII Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
LII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LII Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
LII Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
LII Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
LII Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SKYW vs. LII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SkyWest, Inc. (SKYW) and Lennox International Inc. (LII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SKYWLIIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.00

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.52

-0.18

-0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.98

-0.29

-0.69

SKYW vs. LII - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SKYW Sharpe Ratio is -0.53, which is lower than the LII Sharpe Ratio of -0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SKYW and LII, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SKYWLIIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.53

-0.18

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.31

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

0.53

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.43

-0.19

Drawdowns

SKYW vs. LII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SKYW drawdown since its inception was -81.77%, which is greater than LII's maximum drawdown of -62.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SKYW and LII.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SKYWLIIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.77%

-62.76%

-19.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.63%

-33.77%

-2.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.63%

-34.71%

-1.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-71.50%

-46.88%

-24.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.77%

-46.88%

-34.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.47%

-23.22%

-9.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.43%

-14.50%

-20.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.52%

20.72%

-1.20%

Volatility

SKYW vs. LII - Volatility Comparison

SkyWest, Inc. (SKYW) has a higher volatility of 10.85% compared to Lennox International Inc. (LII) at 9.20%. This indicates that SKYW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LII based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SKYWLIIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.85%

9.20%

+1.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.99%

25.88%

+1.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.35%

34.85%

+1.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.54%

32.05%

+11.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.44%

29.27%

+22.17%

Dividends

SKYW vs. LII - Dividend Comparison

SKYW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LII
Lennox International Inc.
1.01%1.04%0.75%0.97%1.71%1.09%1.12%1.21%1.11%0.94%1.08%1.10%
SKYW
SkyWest, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.35%0.74%0.90%0.60%0.52%0.84%

Financials

SKYW vs. LII - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SkyWest, Inc. and Lennox International Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B1.60B20222023202420252026
1.01B
1.14B
(SKYW) Total Revenue
(LII) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SKYW vs. LII - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between SkyWest, Inc. and Lennox International Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
58.3%
31.0%
Portfolio components
SKYW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SkyWest, Inc. reported a gross profit of 591.07M and revenue of 1.01B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.3%.

LII - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lennox International Inc. reported a gross profit of 351.30M and revenue of 1.14B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.0%.

SKYW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SkyWest, Inc. reported an operating income of 123.69M and revenue of 1.01B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.2%.

LII - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lennox International Inc. reported an operating income of 163.50M and revenue of 1.14B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.4%.

SKYW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SkyWest, Inc. reported a net income of 101.69M and revenue of 1.01B, resulting in a net margin of 10.0%.

LII - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lennox International Inc. reported a net income of 117.20M and revenue of 1.14B, resulting in a net margin of 10.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SKYW and LII have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SKYW has higher volatility (10.85%) compared to LII (9.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SKYW dropped -81.77% vs LII's -62.76%.

LII currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.18 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SKYW and LII

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer