PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SKYU vs. IQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SKYU vs. IQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cloud Computing ETF (SKYU) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (IQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SKYU achieves a -12.74% return, which is significantly lower than IQQQ's 13.95% return.


SKYU

1D
-3.96%
1M
-12.28%
YTD
-12.74%
6M
-15.69%
1Y
0.09%
3Y*
26.71%
5Y*
-6.58%
10Y*

IQQQ

1D
0.87%
1M
-2.10%
YTD
13.95%
6M
12.28%
1Y
29.47%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SKYU vs. IQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SKYU
ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cloud Computing ETF
-12.74%2.76%45.81%
IQQQ
ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
13.95%17.11%14.82%

Correlation

The correlation between SKYU and IQQQ is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2024

0.73

The correlation between SKYU and IQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SKYU vs. IQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SKYU
SKYU Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
SKYU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SKYU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
SKYU Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
SKYU Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
SKYU Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

IQQQ
IQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
IQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
IQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SKYU vs. IQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cloud Computing ETF (SKYU) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (IQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SKYUIQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.30

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.00

2.66

-2.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.00

9.05

-9.04

SKYU vs. IQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SKYU Sharpe Ratio is 0.00, which is lower than the IQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SKYU and IQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SKYU vs. IQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SKYU drawdown since its inception was -83.01%, which is greater than IQQQ's maximum drawdown of -20.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SKYU and IQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SKYUIQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.01%

-20.41%

-62.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.23%

-11.13%

-39.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-83.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.81%

-4.31%

-39.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-49.00%

-3.63%

-45.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.70%

3.27%

+21.43%

Volatility

SKYU vs. IQQQ - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cloud Computing ETF (SKYU) has a higher volatility of 26.41% compared to ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (IQQQ) at 8.20%. This indicates that SKYU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SKYUIQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.41%

8.20%

+18.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

48.23%

13.57%

+34.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.35%

17.00%

+40.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

62.19%

19.06%

+43.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.12%

19.06%

+42.06%

SKYU vs. IQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SKYU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than IQQQ's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

SKYU vs. IQQQ - Dividend Comparison

SKYU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, less than IQQQ's 4.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
IQQQ
ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
4.61%10.34%7.27%
SKYU
ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Cloud Computing ETF
0.94%0.56%0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


SKYU and IQQQ have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SKYU has higher volatility (26.41%) compared to IQQQ (8.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SKYU dropped -83.01% vs IQQQ's -20.41%.

On 1-year performance, IQQQ leads with 29.47% vs 0.09% for SKYU. On fees, IQQQ is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, IQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 8.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IQQQ has performed better with a 29.47% return vs 0.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IQQQ is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SKYU.

IQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.61%, compared with 0.94% for SKYU.

SKYU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while IQQQ is Nasdaq-100. SKYU tracks ISE Cloud Computing Index (200%), while IQQQ tracks Nasdaq-100 Daily Covered Call Index. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SKYU and 0.55% for IQQQ.

IQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SKYU and IQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer