SKF vs. UPRO
SKF (ProShares UltraShort Financials) and UPRO (ProShares UltraPro S&P 500) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - SKF tracks the DJ Global United States (All) / Financials -IND (-200%) while UPRO tracks the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SKF returned -27.50%/yr vs 30.18%/yr for UPRO. At a correlation of -0.83, they often move in opposite directions. SKF charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for UPRO.
Performance
SKF vs. UPRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SKF achieves a 2.60% return, which is significantly lower than UPRO's 17.21% return. Over the past 10 years, SKF has underperformed UPRO with an annualized return of -27.50%, while UPRO has yielded a comparatively higher 30.18% annualized return.
SKF
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- -7.49%
- YTD
- 2.60%
- 6M
- 5.47%
- 1Y
- -10.08%
- 3Y*
- -27.28%
- 5Y*
- -17.96%
- 10Y*
- -27.50%
UPRO
- 1D
- -4.27%
- 1M
- -5.38%
- YTD
- 17.21%
- 6M
- 13.86%
- 1Y
- 62.29%
- 3Y*
- 46.23%
- 5Y*
- 20.37%
- 10Y*
- 30.18%
SKF vs. UPRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SKF ProShares UltraShort Financials | 2.60% | -23.99% | -36.29% | -21.78% | 17.63% | -47.66% | -42.40% | -42.97% | 16.42% | -31.70% |
UPRO ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 | 17.21% | 31.88% | 63.57% | 68.53% | -56.84% | 98.64% | 10.09% | 102.30% | -25.11% | 71.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between SKF and UPRO is -0.57, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.76 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2009 | -0.83 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between SKF and UPRO has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.83 to -0.57, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.
SKF vs. UPRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SKF
UPRO
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
SKF
UPRO
Basic Materials
SKF
-
UPRO
Communication Services
SKF
-
UPRO
Consumer Cyclical
SKF
-
UPRO
Consumer Defensive
SKF
-
UPRO
Energy
SKF
-
UPRO
Healthcare
SKF
-
UPRO
Industrials
SKF
-
UPRO
Real Estate
SKF
-
UPRO
Technology
SKF
-
UPRO
Utilities
SKF
-
UPRO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SKF vs. UPRO — Risk / Return Rank
SKF
UPRO
SKF vs. UPRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Financials (SKF) and ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SKF | UPRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.28 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.46 | 2.34 | -2.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.05 | 9.52 | -10.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SKF vs. UPRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SKF drawdown since its inception was -99.96%, which is greater than UPRO's maximum drawdown of -76.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SKF and UPRO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SKF | UPRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.96% | -76.82% | -23.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.02% | -26.78% | +4.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.09% | -48.87% | -19.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.40% | -63.94% | -8.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.51% | -76.82% | -19.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.95% | -10.27% | -89.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -89.27% | -14.39% | -74.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.95% | 6.57% | +3.38% |
Volatility
SKF vs. UPRO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort Financials (SKF) is 8.32%, while ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO) has a volatility of 14.68%. This indicates that SKF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UPRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SKF | UPRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.32% | 14.68% | -6.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.47% | 29.49% | -7.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.21% | 37.35% | -8.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.04% | 50.62% | -14.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.82% | 53.79% | -12.97% |
SKF vs. UPRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SKF has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than UPRO's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
SKF vs. UPRO - Dividend Comparison
SKF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.61%, more than UPRO's 0.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SKF ProShares UltraShort Financials | 4.61% | 5.61% | 7.94% | 3.93% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.11% | 1.29% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UPRO ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 | 0.74% | 0.84% | 0.93% | 0.74% | 0.52% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.41% | 0.63% | 0.00% | 0.12% | 0.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SKF and UPRO have a correlation of -0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UPRO has higher volatility (14.68%) compared to SKF (8.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SKF dropped -99.96% vs UPRO's -76.82%.
On 10-year performance, UPRO leads with 30.18% vs -27.50% for SKF. On fees, UPRO is cheaper at 0.89% per year. On volatility, SKF has been the lower-risk option at 8.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, UPRO has performed better with a 30.18% return vs -27.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UPRO is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SKF.
SKF has the higher dividend yield at 4.61%, compared with 0.74% for UPRO.
SKF tracks DJ Global United States (All) / Financials -IND (-200%), while UPRO tracks S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SKF and 0.89% for UPRO.
UPRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SKF and UPRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer