SKF vs. TQQQ
SKF (ProShares UltraShort Financials) and TQQQ (ProShares UltraPro QQQ) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - SKF tracks the DJ Global United States (All) / Financials -IND (-200%) while TQQQ tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SKF returned -27.12%/yr vs 41.11%/yr for TQQQ. At a correlation of -0.64, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
SKF vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SKF achieves a -5.63% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 28.60% return. Over the past 10 years, SKF has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of -27.12%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 41.11% annualized return.
SKF
- 1D
- 1.75%
- 1M
- -7.92%
- 6M
- -6.77%
- YTD
- -5.63%
- 1Y
- -11.90%
- 3Y*
- -26.28%
- 5Y*
- -19.14%
- 10Y*
- -27.12%
TQQQ
- 1D
- -4.54%
- 1M
- -12.71%
- 6M
- 25.23%
- YTD
- 28.60%
- 1Y
- 56.16%
- 3Y*
- 44.49%
- 5Y*
- 17.69%
- 10Y*
- 41.11%
SKF vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SKF ProShares UltraShort Financials | -5.63% | -23.99% | -36.29% | -21.78% | 17.63% | -47.66% | -42.40% | -42.97% | 16.42% | -31.70% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 28.60% | 34.35% | 58.27% | 198.04% | -79.09% | 82.98% | 110.05% | 133.84% | -19.79% | 118.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between SKF and TQQQ is -0.32, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010 | -0.64 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between SKF and TQQQ has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.64 to -0.32, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.
SKF vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SKF
TQQQ
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
SKF
TQQQ
Basic Materials
SKF
-
TQQQ
Communication Services
SKF
-
TQQQ
Consumer Cyclical
SKF
-
TQQQ
Consumer Defensive
SKF
-
TQQQ
Energy
SKF
-
TQQQ
Healthcare
SKF
-
TQQQ
Industrials
SKF
-
TQQQ
Real Estate
SKF
-
TQQQ
Technology
SKF
-
TQQQ
Utilities
SKF
-
TQQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SKF vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
SKF
TQQQ
SKF vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Financials (SKF) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SKF | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.20 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.42 | 1.53 | -1.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.04 | 4.61 | -5.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SKF vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SKF drawdown since its inception was -99.96%, which is greater than TQQQ's maximum drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SKF and TQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SKF | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.96% | -81.66% | -18.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.69% | -36.97% | +8.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.55% | -58.04% | -10.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.80% | -81.66% | +8.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.89% | -81.66% | -14.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.96% | -22.40% | -77.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -89.31% | -18.48% | -70.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.51% | 12.22% | -0.71% |
Volatility
SKF vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort Financials (SKF) is 8.18%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 22.07%. This indicates that SKF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SKF | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.18% | 22.07% | -13.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.48% | 46.26% | -23.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.26% | 55.75% | -26.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.01% | 67.79% | -31.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.74% | 66.42% | -25.68% |
SKF vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SKF and TQQQ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
SKF vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison
SKF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, more than TQQQ's 0.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SKF ProShares UltraShort Financials | 4.54% | 5.61% | 7.94% | 3.93% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.11% | 1.29% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 0.56% | 0.65% | 1.27% | 1.26% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SKF and TQQQ have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TQQQ has higher volatility (22.07%) compared to SKF (8.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SKF dropped -99.96% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.
On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 41.11% vs -27.12% for SKF. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, SKF has been the lower-risk option at 8.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 41.11% return vs -27.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SKF and TQQQ have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
SKF has the higher dividend yield at 4.54%, compared with 0.56% for TQQQ.
SKF tracks DJ Global United States (All) / Financials -IND (-200%), while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%).
TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SKF and TQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer