SKF vs. EQIN
SKF (ProShares UltraShort Financials) and EQIN (Columbia U.S. Equity Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SKF is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the DJ Global United States (All) / Financials -IND (-200%), while EQIN is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Columbia. SKF is passively managed, while EQIN is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, SKF returned -27.13%/yr vs 12.17%/yr for EQIN. At a correlation of -0.75, they often move in opposite directions. SKF charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for EQIN.
Performance
SKF vs. EQIN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SKF achieves a -5.00% return, which is significantly lower than EQIN's 12.20% return. Over the past 10 years, SKF has underperformed EQIN with an annualized return of -27.13%, while EQIN has yielded a comparatively higher 12.17% annualized return.
SKF
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- -9.77%
- 6M
- -3.25%
- YTD
- -5.00%
- 1Y
- -12.40%
- 3Y*
- -27.16%
- 5Y*
- -18.85%
- 10Y*
- -27.13%
EQIN
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 1.90%
- 6M
- 8.92%
- YTD
- 12.20%
- 1Y
- 18.47%
- 3Y*
- 14.47%
- 5Y*
- 11.11%
- 10Y*
- 12.17%
SKF vs. EQIN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SKF ProShares UltraShort Financials | -5.00% | -23.99% | -36.29% | -21.78% | 17.63% | -47.66% | -42.40% | -42.97% | 16.42% | -31.70% |
EQIN Columbia U.S. Equity Income ETF | 12.20% | 9.37% | 13.82% | 11.58% | 0.66% | 31.18% | 0.67% | 30.67% | -12.22% | 20.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between SKF and EQIN is -0.78, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.83 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2016 | -0.75 |
The correlation between SKF and EQIN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.83 to -0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
SKF vs. EQIN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SKF
EQIN
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
SKF
EQIN
Basic Materials
SKF
-
EQIN
Communication Services
SKF
-
EQIN
Consumer Cyclical
SKF
-
EQIN
Consumer Defensive
SKF
-
EQIN
Energy
SKF
-
EQIN
Healthcare
SKF
-
EQIN
Industrials
SKF
-
EQIN
Real Estate
SKF
-
EQIN
-
Technology
SKF
-
EQIN
Utilities
SKF
-
EQIN
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SKF vs. EQIN — Risk / Return Rank
SKF
EQIN
SKF vs. EQIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Financials (SKF) and Columbia U.S. Equity Income ETF (EQIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SKF | EQIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.31 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.46 | 3.43 | -3.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.13 | 10.26 | -11.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SKF vs. EQIN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SKF drawdown since its inception was -99.96%, which is greater than EQIN's maximum drawdown of -42.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SKF and EQIN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SKF | EQIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.96% | -42.16% | -57.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.08% | -5.41% | -21.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.09% | -12.05% | -56.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.40% | -18.51% | -53.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.83% | -42.16% | -53.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.96% | 0.00% | -99.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -89.30% | -4.85% | -84.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.99% | 1.81% | +9.18% |
Volatility
SKF vs. EQIN - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort Financials (SKF) has a higher volatility of 8.58% compared to Columbia U.S. Equity Income ETF (EQIN) at 2.91%. This indicates that SKF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SKF | EQIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.58% | 2.91% | +5.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.76% | 7.19% | +15.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.50% | 10.42% | +19.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.03% | 14.58% | +21.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.76% | 18.46% | +22.30% |
SKF vs. EQIN - Expense Ratio Comparison
SKF has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than EQIN's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SKF vs. EQIN - Dividend Comparison
SKF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, more than EQIN's 1.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQIN Columbia U.S. Equity Income ETF | 1.86% | 2.05% | 4.34% | 2.41% | 2.71% | 2.57% | 2.54% | 2.70% | 7.81% | 11.52% | 2.44% |
SKF ProShares UltraShort Financials | 4.51% | 5.61% | 7.94% | 3.93% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.11% | 1.29% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SKF and EQIN have a correlation of -0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SKF has higher volatility (8.58%) compared to EQIN (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SKF dropped -99.96% vs EQIN's -42.16%.
On 10-year performance, EQIN leads with 12.17% vs -27.13% for SKF. On fees, EQIN is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, EQIN has been the lower-risk option at 2.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EQIN has performed better with a 12.17% return vs -27.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EQIN is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SKF.
SKF has the higher dividend yield at 4.51%, compared with 1.86% for EQIN.
SKF is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while EQIN is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Columbia. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SKF and 0.35% for EQIN.
EQIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SKF and EQIN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer