SKF vs. BRKL
SKF (ProShares UltraShort Financials) and BRKL (Corgi BRKB 2x Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SKF is passively managed, while BRKL is actively managed. Their -0.44 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. SKF charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for BRKL.
Performance
SKF vs. BRKL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SKF
- 1D
- -1.38%
- 1M
- -5.58%
- 6M
- -11.53%
- YTD
- -8.93%
- 1Y
- -18.86%
- 3Y*
- -27.34%
- 5Y*
- -19.36%
- 10Y*
- -27.10%
- ALL TIME*
- -28.15%
BRKL
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.37K | $14.77K | $14.77K | |
| $327.82K | $374.40K | $433.73K |
SKF vs. BRKL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SKF ProShares UltraShort Financials | -3.98% |
BRKL Corgi BRKB 2x Daily ETF | 1.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between SKF and BRKL is -0.44, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2026 | -0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SKF vs. BRKL — Risk / Return Rank
SKF
BRKL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SKF vs. BRKL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Financials (SKF) and Corgi BRKB 2x Daily ETF (BRKL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SKF | BRKL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.62 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.46 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SKF vs. BRKL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SKF drawdown since its inception was -99.96%, which is greater than BRKL's maximum drawdown of -7.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SKF and BRKL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SKF | BRKL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.96% | -7.03% | -92.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.38% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.53% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.96% | 0.00% | -99.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -89.33% | -3.93% | -85.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.93% | — | — |
Volatility
SKF vs. BRKL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SKF | BRKL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.55% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.16% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.32% | 30.17% | -0.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.92% | 30.17% | +5.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.78% | 30.17% | +10.61% |
SKF vs. BRKL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SKF has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BRKL's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
SKF vs. BRKL - Dividend Comparison
SKF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, while BRKL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRKL Corgi BRKB 2x Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SKF ProShares UltraShort Financials | 4.70% | 5.61% | 7.94% | 3.93% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.11% | 1.29% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SKF and BRKL have a correlation of -0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BRKL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BRKL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SKF.
SKF has the higher dividend yield at 4.70%, compared with 0.00% for BRKL.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Corgi. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SKF and 0.45% for BRKL.
Find the right allocation for SKF and BRKL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer