SJLD vs. ENFR

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SJLD (SanJac Alpha Low Duration ETF) and ENFR (Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SJLD is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by SanJac Alpha, while ENFR is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. SJLD is actively managed, while ENFR is passively managed. Over the past year, SJLD returned 4.58% vs 27.76% for ENFR. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.

Performance

SJLD vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SanJac Alpha Low Duration ETF (SJLD) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SJLD achieves a 1.71% return, which is significantly lower than ENFR's 24.93% return.

SJLD

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.18%
• YTD: 1.71%
• 6M: 1.76%
• 1Y: 4.58%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ENFR

• 1D: 1.51%
• 1M: -4.52%
• YTD: 24.93%
• 6M: 25.03%
• 1Y: 27.76%
• 3Y*: 28.90%
• 5Y*: 20.07%
• 10Y*: 11.98%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SJLD vs. ENFR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SJLD SanJac Alpha Low Duration ETF	1.71%	5.20%	0.91%
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF	24.93%	5.88%	13.71%

Correlation

The correlation between SJLD and ENFR is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2024	0.02

The correlation between SJLD and ENFR shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SJLD vs. ENFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SJLD

SJLD Risk / Return Rank: 88
SJLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
SJLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
SJLD Omega Ratio Rank: 93
SJLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
SJLD Martin Ratio Rank: 92

ENFR

ENFR Risk / Return Rank: 57
ENFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
ENFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
ENFR Omega Ratio Rank: 54
ENFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
ENFR Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SJLD vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SanJac Alpha Low Duration ETF (SJLD) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SJLD	ENFR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.35	1.88	+0.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.86	2.59	+1.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.57	1.32	+0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.40	3.23	+1.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.13	8.24	+11.89

SJLD vs. ENFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SJLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the ENFR Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SJLD and ENFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SJLD vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SJLD drawdown since its inception was -1.04%, smaller than the maximum ENFR drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SJLD and ENFR.

Drawdown Indicators

	SJLD	ENFR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.04%	-68.28%	+67.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.04%	-8.64%	+7.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.58%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.29%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-62.64%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.16%	-4.71%	+4.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.12%	-15.94%	+15.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.23%	3.38%	-3.15%

Volatility

SJLD vs. ENFR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SanJac Alpha Low Duration ETF (SJLD) is 0.29%, while Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) has a volatility of 5.69%. This indicates that SJLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SJLD	ENFR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.29%	5.69%	-5.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.16%	11.60%	-10.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.98%	14.86%	-12.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.93%	19.25%	-17.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.93%	24.68%	-22.75%

SJLD vs. ENFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SJLD and ENFR have an expense ratio of 0.35%.

Dividends

SJLD vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison

SJLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, more than ENFR's 4.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF	4.02%	4.77%	4.41%	5.48%	5.23%	7.86%	7.57%	5.81%	3.98%	2.98%	3.31%	3.34%
SJLD SanJac Alpha Low Duration ETF	4.43%	3.74%	1.26%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SJLD and ENFR in my portfolio?

SJLD and ENFR have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SJLD or ENFR?

ENFR has higher volatility (5.69%) compared to SJLD (0.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SJLD dropped -1.04% vs ENFR's -68.28%.

Which ETF is better, SJLD or ENFR?

On 1-year performance, ENFR leads with 27.76% vs 4.58% for SJLD. Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. On volatility, SJLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SJLD or ENFR?

Over the 1-year period, ENFR has performed better with a 27.76% return vs 4.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SJLD or ENFR?

SJLD and ENFR have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SJLD or ENFR?

SJLD has the higher dividend yield at 4.43%, compared with 4.02% for ENFR.

What is the main difference between SJLD and ENFR?

SJLD is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while ENFR is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: SanJac Alpha and SS&C.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SJLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.