SJCP vs. GTO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SJCP (SanJac Alpha Core Plus Bond ETF) and GTO (Invesco Total Return Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SJCP returned 4.86% vs 6.41% for GTO. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SJCP charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for GTO.

Performance

SJCP vs. GTO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SanJac Alpha Core Plus Bond ETF (SJCP) and Invesco Total Return Bond ETF (GTO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with SJCP at 0.68% and GTO at 0.68%.

SJCP

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: -0.38%
• YTD: 0.68%
• 6M: 0.87%
• 1Y: 4.86%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GTO

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 0.49%
• YTD: 0.68%
• 6M: 0.69%
• 1Y: 6.41%
• 3Y*: 4.86%
• 5Y*: 0.07%
• 10Y*: 2.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SJCP vs. GTO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SJCP SanJac Alpha Core Plus Bond ETF	0.68%	6.27%	-0.16%
GTO Invesco Total Return Bond ETF	0.68%	7.17%	-3.14%

Correlation

The correlation between SJCP and GTO is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2024	0.38

Return for Risk

SJCP vs. GTO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SJCP

SJCP Risk / Return Rank: 62
SJCP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
SJCP Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
SJCP Omega Ratio Rank: 75
SJCP Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
SJCP Martin Ratio Rank: 59

GTO

GTO Risk / Return Rank: 53
GTO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
GTO Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
GTO Omega Ratio Rank: 56
GTO Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
GTO Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SJCP vs. GTO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SanJac Alpha Core Plus Bond ETF (SJCP) and Invesco Total Return Bond ETF (GTO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SJCP	GTO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.00	1.88	+0.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.93	2.80	+0.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.35	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.43	2.36	+0.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.39	7.50	+2.89
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SJCP vs. GTO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SJCP Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the GTO Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SJCP and GTO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SJCP	GTO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.00	1.88	+0.13
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.01	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.53	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.65	0.52	+1.13

Drawdowns

SJCP vs. GTO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SJCP drawdown since its inception was -2.01%, smaller than the maximum GTO drawdown of -20.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SJCP and GTO.

Drawdown Indicators

	SJCP	GTO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.01%	-20.61%	+18.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.01%	-2.73%	+0.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-5.98%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.61%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-20.61%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.63%	-1.62%	+0.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.25%	-4.80%	+4.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.47%	0.86%	-0.39%

Volatility

SJCP vs. GTO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SanJac Alpha Core Plus Bond ETF (SJCP) is 0.59%, while Invesco Total Return Bond ETF (GTO) has a volatility of 1.19%. This indicates that SJCP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GTO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SJCP	GTO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.59%	1.19%	-0.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.70%	2.50%	-0.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.43%	3.43%	-1.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.38%	5.68%	-3.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.38%	5.58%	-3.20%

SJCP vs. GTO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SJCP has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than GTO's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

SJCP vs. GTO - Dividend Comparison

SJCP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%, less than GTO's 4.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
GTO Invesco Total Return Bond ETF	4.76%	4.70%	4.42%	4.05%	3.47%	1.93%	4.04%	2.97%	5.25%	2.81%	2.57%
SJCP SanJac Alpha Core Plus Bond ETF	4.37%	4.05%	1.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SJCP and GTO in my portfolio?

SJCP and GTO have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SJCP or GTO?

GTO has higher volatility (1.19%) compared to SJCP (0.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SJCP dropped -2.01% vs GTO's -20.61%.

Which ETF is better, SJCP or GTO?

On 1-year performance, GTO leads with 6.41% vs 4.86% for SJCP. On fees, GTO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, SJCP has been the lower-risk option at 0.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SJCP or GTO?

Over the 1-year period, GTO has performed better with a 6.41% return vs 4.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SJCP or GTO?

GTO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SJCP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SJCP or GTO?

GTO has the higher dividend yield at 4.76%, compared with 4.37% for SJCP.

What is the main difference between SJCP and GTO?

They also come from different issuers: SanJac Alpha and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SJCP and 0.35% for GTO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SJCP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.