PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SJCP vs. SJLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SJCP vs. SJLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SanJac Alpha Core Plus Bond ETF (SJCP) and SanJac Alpha Low Duration ETF (SJLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SJCP achieves a 1.12% return, which is significantly lower than SJLD's 2.28% return.


SJCP

1D
0.06%
1M
0.20%
6M
0.72%
YTD
1.12%
1Y
3.77%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.80%

SJLD

1D
0.02%
1M
0.42%
6M
1.85%
YTD
2.28%
1Y
3.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$33.92K$23.83K$91.45K
$851.30$1.09K$3.25K

SJCP vs. SJLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SJCP
SanJac Alpha Core Plus Bond ETF
1.12%6.27%-0.16%
SJLD
SanJac Alpha Low Duration ETF
2.28%5.20%0.91%

Correlation

The correlation between SJCP and SJLD is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2024

0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SJCP vs. SJLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SJCP
SJCP Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SJCP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SJCP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
SJCP Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
SJCP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
SJCP Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

SJLD
SJLD Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
SJLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SJLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
SJLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
SJLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
SJLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SJCP vs. SJLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SanJac Alpha Core Plus Bond ETF (SJCP) and SanJac Alpha Low Duration ETF (SJLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SJCPSJLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.69

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.04

4.52

-2.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.01

21.64

-13.63

SJCP vs. SJLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SJCP Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is lower than the SJLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SJCP and SJLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SJCP vs. SJLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SJCP drawdown since its inception was -2.01%, which is greater than SJLD's maximum drawdown of -1.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SJCP and SJLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SJCPSJLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.01%

-1.04%

-0.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.01%

-1.04%

-0.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

0.00%

-0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.27%

-0.11%

-0.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.51%

0.22%

+0.29%

Volatility

SJCP vs. SJLD - Volatility Comparison

SanJac Alpha Core Plus Bond ETF (SJCP) has a higher volatility of 0.55% compared to SanJac Alpha Low Duration ETF (SJLD) at 0.28%. This indicates that SJCP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SJLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SJCPSJLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.55%

0.28%

+0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.96%

1.16%

+0.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49%

1.79%

+0.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.40%

1.88%

+0.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.40%

1.88%

+0.52%

SJCP vs. SJLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SJCP has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SJLD's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

SJCP vs. SJLD - Dividend Comparison

SJCP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.79%, less than SJLD's 4.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
SJCP
SanJac Alpha Core Plus Bond ETF
3.79%4.05%1.40%
SJLD
SanJac Alpha Low Duration ETF
4.40%3.74%1.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


SJCP and SJLD have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SJCP has higher volatility (0.55%) compared to SJLD (0.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SJCP dropped -2.01% vs SJLD's -1.04%.

On 1-year performance, SJLD leads with 3.87% vs 3.77% for SJCP. On fees, SJLD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, SJLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SJLD has performed better with a 3.87% return vs 3.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SJLD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SJCP.

SJLD has the higher dividend yield at 4.40%, compared with 3.79% for SJCP.

SJCP is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while SJLD is Short-Term Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SJCP and 0.35% for SJLD.

SJLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SJCP and SJLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer