SJCIX vs. ALSMX
SJCIX (Crossmark Steward Large Cap Core Fund) and ALSMX (Archer Multi Cap Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 3 years, SJCIX returned 18.51%/yr vs 24.23%/yr for ALSMX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SJCIX charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for ALSMX.
Performance
SJCIX vs. ALSMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SJCIX achieves a 9.44% return, which is significantly lower than ALSMX's 25.38% return.
SJCIX
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- 9.44%
- 6M
- 8.52%
- 1Y
- 22.61%
- 3Y*
- 18.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ALSMX
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- 1.02%
- YTD
- 25.38%
- 6M
- 23.53%
- 1Y
- 42.03%
- 3Y*
- 24.23%
- 5Y*
- 13.30%
- 10Y*
- —
SJCIX vs. ALSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SJCIX Crossmark Steward Large Cap Core Fund | 9.44% | 10.93% | 23.23% | 24.01% | -7.99% |
ALSMX Archer Multi Cap Fund | 25.38% | 11.47% | 21.78% | 25.14% | -4.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between SJCIX and ALSMX is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2022 | 0.90 |
The correlation between SJCIX and ALSMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SJCIX vs. ALSMX — Risk / Return Rank
SJCIX
ALSMX
SJCIX vs. ALSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crossmark Steward Large Cap Core Fund (SJCIX) and Archer Multi Cap Fund (ALSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SJCIX | ALSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.44 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.27 | 4.46 | -2.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.16 | 18.98 | -9.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SJCIX vs. ALSMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SJCIX drawdown since its inception was -22.12%, smaller than the maximum ALSMX drawdown of -97.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SJCIX and ALSMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SJCIX | ALSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.12% | -97.87% | +75.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.86% | -9.42% | -0.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.47% | -97.87% | +77.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -97.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.27% | -96.43% | +95.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.55% | -28.48% | +22.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.43% | 2.21% | +0.22% |
Volatility
SJCIX vs. ALSMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Crossmark Steward Large Cap Core Fund (SJCIX) is 4.22%, while Archer Multi Cap Fund (ALSMX) has a volatility of 6.41%. This indicates that SJCIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SJCIX | ALSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.22% | 6.41% | -2.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.68% | 14.22% | -3.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.60% | 16.92% | -3.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.95% | 1,292.06% | -1,274.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.95% | 1,136.37% | -1,118.42% |
SJCIX vs. ALSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SJCIX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than ALSMX's 0.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
SJCIX vs. ALSMX - Dividend Comparison
SJCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.93%, more than ALSMX's 5.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALSMX Archer Multi Cap Fund | 5.71% | 7.16% | 3.62% | 0.46% | 7.12% | 1.62% | 0.43% |
SJCIX Crossmark Steward Large Cap Core Fund | 5.93% | 6.49% | 1.42% | 0.74% | 0.96% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SJCIX and ALSMX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ALSMX has higher volatility (6.41%) compared to SJCIX (4.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SJCIX dropped -22.12% vs ALSMX's -97.87%.
ALSMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SJCIX and ALSMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer