ALSMX vs. AFOCX
ALSMX (Archer Multi Cap Fund) and AFOCX (Archer Focus Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds from Archer. Over the past 5 years, ALSMX returned 13.30%/yr vs 10.24%/yr for AFOCX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ALSMX charges 0.96%/yr vs 3.29%/yr for AFOCX.
Performance
ALSMX vs. AFOCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ALSMX achieves a 25.38% return, which is significantly higher than AFOCX's 10.44% return.
ALSMX
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- 1.02%
- YTD
- 25.38%
- 6M
- 23.53%
- 1Y
- 42.03%
- 3Y*
- 24.23%
- 5Y*
- 13.30%
- 10Y*
- —
AFOCX
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 1.31%
- YTD
- 10.44%
- 6M
- 9.80%
- 1Y
- 15.86%
- 3Y*
- 15.45%
- 5Y*
- 10.24%
- 10Y*
- —
ALSMX vs. AFOCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALSMX Archer Multi Cap Fund | 25.38% | 11.47% | 21.78% | 25.14% | -20.12% | 16.58% | 16.01% | 0.00% |
AFOCX Archer Focus Fund | 10.44% | 0.73% | 29.35% | 14.14% | -9.32% | 19.98% | 10.13% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between ALSMX and AFOCX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2019 | 0.86 |
The correlation between ALSMX and AFOCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ALSMX vs. AFOCX — Risk / Return Rank
ALSMX
AFOCX
ALSMX vs. AFOCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Archer Multi Cap Fund (ALSMX) and Archer Focus Fund (AFOCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ALSMX | AFOCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.22 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.46 | 1.85 | +2.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.98 | 6.37 | +12.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ALSMX vs. AFOCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALSMX drawdown since its inception was -97.87%, which is greater than AFOCX's maximum drawdown of -91.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALSMX and AFOCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ALSMX | AFOCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.87% | -91.26% | -6.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.42% | -8.49% | -0.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -97.87% | -91.26% | -6.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -97.87% | -91.26% | -6.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.43% | -88.68% | -7.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.48% | -23.16% | -5.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.21% | 2.46% | -0.25% |
Volatility
ALSMX vs. AFOCX - Volatility Comparison
Archer Multi Cap Fund (ALSMX) has a higher volatility of 6.41% compared to Archer Focus Fund (AFOCX) at 4.16%. This indicates that ALSMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AFOCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ALSMX | AFOCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.41% | 4.16% | +2.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.22% | 9.73% | +4.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.92% | 12.48% | +4.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1,292.06% | 385.70% | +906.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1,136.37% | 339.40% | +796.97% |
ALSMX vs. AFOCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ALSMX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is lower than AFOCX's 3.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
ALSMX vs. AFOCX - Dividend Comparison
ALSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.71%, more than AFOCX's 2.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFOCX Archer Focus Fund | 2.48% | 2.63% | 22.61% | 1.65% | 6.64% | 9.74% | 0.57% |
ALSMX Archer Multi Cap Fund | 5.71% | 7.16% | 3.62% | 0.46% | 7.12% | 1.62% | 0.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ALSMX and AFOCX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ALSMX has higher volatility (6.41%) compared to AFOCX (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALSMX dropped -97.87% vs AFOCX's -91.26%.
ALSMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ALSMX and AFOCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer