SIZE vs. VLUE
SIZE (iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF) and VLUE (iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SIZE is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Low Size Index, while VLUE is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Enhanced Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SIZE returned 12.00%/yr vs 15.56%/yr for VLUE. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.
Performance
SIZE vs. VLUE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIZE achieves a 8.82% return, which is significantly lower than VLUE's 45.30% return. Over the past 10 years, SIZE has underperformed VLUE with an annualized return of 12.00%, while VLUE has yielded a comparatively higher 15.56% annualized return.
SIZE
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- YTD
- 8.82%
- 6M
- 7.67%
- 1Y
- 17.11%
- 3Y*
- 15.52%
- 5Y*
- 7.90%
- 10Y*
- 12.00%
VLUE
- 1D
- -3.46%
- 1M
- 5.59%
- YTD
- 45.30%
- 6M
- 44.72%
- 1Y
- 81.73%
- 3Y*
- 32.50%
- 5Y*
- 16.52%
- 10Y*
- 15.56%
SIZE vs. VLUE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIZE iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF | 8.82% | 10.51% | 14.37% | 17.78% | -15.86% | 25.05% | 16.26% | 28.97% | -6.59% | 18.76% |
VLUE iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF | 45.30% | 32.67% | 7.25% | 14.26% | -14.17% | 28.93% | -0.23% | 27.20% | -11.13% | 21.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIZE and VLUE is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2013 | 0.83 |
The correlation between SIZE and VLUE shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.89 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SIZE vs. VLUE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SIZE
VLUE
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Technology
SIZE
VLUE
Industrials
SIZE
VLUE
Financial Services
SIZE
VLUE
Consumer Cyclical
SIZE
VLUE
Healthcare
SIZE
VLUE
Utilities
SIZE
VLUE
Consumer Defensive
SIZE
VLUE
Real Estate
SIZE
VLUE
Basic Materials
SIZE
VLUE
Communication Services
SIZE
VLUE
Energy
SIZE
VLUE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIZE vs. VLUE — Risk / Return Rank
SIZE
VLUE
SIZE vs. VLUE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF (SIZE) and iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SIZE | VLUE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.73 | -0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.16 | 9.09 | -6.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.33 | 38.03 | -29.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SIZE vs. VLUE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIZE drawdown since its inception was -39.15%, roughly equal to the maximum VLUE drawdown of -39.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIZE and VLUE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIZE | VLUE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.15% | -39.47% | +0.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.97% | -9.04% | +1.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.71% | -17.89% | -0.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.03% | -27.12% | +3.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.15% | -39.47% | +0.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.59% | -3.46% | +1.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.17% | -6.00% | +1.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.06% | 2.16% | -0.10% |
Volatility
SIZE vs. VLUE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF (SIZE) is 3.87%, while iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE) has a volatility of 9.76%. This indicates that SIZE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VLUE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIZE | VLUE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.87% | 9.76% | -5.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.83% | 16.13% | -6.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.98% | 19.07% | -6.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.43% | 18.12% | -0.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.70% | 19.95% | -1.25% |
SIZE vs. VLUE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SIZE and VLUE have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SIZE vs. VLUE - Dividend Comparison
SIZE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, less than VLUE's 1.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIZE iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF | 1.40% | 1.50% | 1.53% | 1.42% | 1.59% | 1.19% | 1.43% | 1.35% | 2.43% | 1.58% | 1.88% | 1.95% |
VLUE iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF | 1.42% | 2.11% | 2.73% | 2.66% | 3.18% | 2.22% | 2.42% | 2.61% | 2.70% | 2.14% | 2.07% | 2.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SIZE and VLUE have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VLUE has higher volatility (9.76%) compared to SIZE (3.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIZE dropped -39.15% vs VLUE's -39.47%.
On 10-year performance, VLUE leads with 15.56% vs 12.00% for SIZE. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, SIZE has been the lower-risk option at 3.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VLUE has performed better with a 15.56% return vs 12.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SIZE and VLUE have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.
VLUE has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 1.40% for SIZE.
SIZE is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while VLUE is Large Cap Value Equities. SIZE tracks MSCI USA Low Size Index, while VLUE tracks MSCI USA Enhanced Value Index.
VLUE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.31 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SIZE and VLUE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer