PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIZE vs. VLUE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SIZE vs. VLUE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF (SIZE) and iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIZE achieves a 8.82% return, which is significantly lower than VLUE's 45.30% return. Over the past 10 years, SIZE has underperformed VLUE with an annualized return of 12.00%, while VLUE has yielded a comparatively higher 15.56% annualized return.


SIZE

1D
-0.38%
1M
0.73%
YTD
8.82%
6M
7.67%
1Y
17.11%
3Y*
15.52%
5Y*
7.90%
10Y*
12.00%

VLUE

1D
-3.46%
1M
5.59%
YTD
45.30%
6M
44.72%
1Y
81.73%
3Y*
32.50%
5Y*
16.52%
10Y*
15.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIZE vs. VLUE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SIZE
iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF
8.82%10.51%14.37%17.78%-15.86%25.05%16.26%28.97%-6.59%18.76%
VLUE
iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF
45.30%32.67%7.25%14.26%-14.17%28.93%-0.23%27.20%-11.13%21.95%

Correlation

The correlation between SIZE and VLUE is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2013

0.83

The correlation between SIZE and VLUE shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.89 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SIZE vs. VLUE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SIZE
VLUE

Technology

20.0%
40.7%

Industrials

15.3%
8.0%

Financial Services

14.7%
10.5%

Consumer Cyclical

11.2%
10.1%

Healthcare

10.7%
7.9%

Utilities

5.4%
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

5.3%
4.4%

Real Estate

5.3%
1.8%

Basic Materials

4.3%
1.3%

Communication Services

3.9%
9.5%

Energy

3.7%
3.5%

Technology

SIZE
20.0%
VLUE
40.7%

Industrials

SIZE
15.3%
VLUE
8.0%

Financial Services

SIZE
14.7%
VLUE
10.5%

Consumer Cyclical

SIZE
11.2%
VLUE
10.1%

Healthcare

SIZE
10.7%
VLUE
7.9%

Utilities

SIZE
5.4%
VLUE
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

SIZE
5.3%
VLUE
4.4%

Real Estate

SIZE
5.3%
VLUE
1.8%

Basic Materials

SIZE
4.3%
VLUE
1.3%

Communication Services

SIZE
3.9%
VLUE
9.5%

Energy

SIZE
3.7%
VLUE
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIZE vs. VLUE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIZE
SIZE Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
SIZE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIZE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIZE Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
SIZE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIZE Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

VLUE
VLUE Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
VLUE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VLUE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
VLUE Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
VLUE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
VLUE Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIZE vs. VLUE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF (SIZE) and iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SIZEVLUEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.73

-0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

9.09

-6.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.33

38.03

-29.70

SIZE vs. VLUE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIZE Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is lower than the VLUE Sharpe Ratio of 4.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIZE and VLUE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SIZE vs. VLUE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIZE drawdown since its inception was -39.15%, roughly equal to the maximum VLUE drawdown of -39.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIZE and VLUE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SIZEVLUEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.15%

-39.47%

+0.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.97%

-9.04%

+1.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.71%

-17.89%

-0.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.03%

-27.12%

+3.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.15%

-39.47%

+0.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.59%

-3.46%

+1.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.17%

-6.00%

+1.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

2.16%

-0.10%

Volatility

SIZE vs. VLUE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF (SIZE) is 3.87%, while iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE) has a volatility of 9.76%. This indicates that SIZE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VLUE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SIZEVLUEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.87%

9.76%

-5.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.83%

16.13%

-6.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.98%

19.07%

-6.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.43%

18.12%

-0.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.70%

19.95%

-1.25%

SIZE vs. VLUE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SIZE and VLUE have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SIZE vs. VLUE - Dividend Comparison

SIZE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, less than VLUE's 1.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SIZE
iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF
1.40%1.50%1.53%1.42%1.59%1.19%1.43%1.35%2.43%1.58%1.88%1.95%
VLUE
iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF
1.42%2.11%2.73%2.66%3.18%2.22%2.42%2.61%2.70%2.14%2.07%2.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


SIZE and VLUE have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VLUE has higher volatility (9.76%) compared to SIZE (3.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIZE dropped -39.15% vs VLUE's -39.47%.

On 10-year performance, VLUE leads with 15.56% vs 12.00% for SIZE. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, SIZE has been the lower-risk option at 3.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VLUE has performed better with a 15.56% return vs 12.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SIZE and VLUE have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

VLUE has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 1.40% for SIZE.

SIZE is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while VLUE is Large Cap Value Equities. SIZE tracks MSCI USA Low Size Index, while VLUE tracks MSCI USA Enhanced Value Index.

VLUE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.31 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIZE and VLUE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer