SIXS vs. SFLO

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

SIXS (6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF) and SFLO (Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. SIXS is actively managed, while SFLO is passively managed. Over the past year, SIXS returned 29.50% vs 44.31% for SFLO. Their correlation of 0.81 means they have usually moved in the same direction. SIXS charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for SFLO.

Performance

SIXS vs. SFLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF (SIXS) and Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF (SFLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIXS achieves a 18.12% return, which is significantly lower than SFLO's 27.87% return.

SIXS

• 1D: -0.69%
• 1M: 0.60%
• 6M: 13.90%
• YTD: 18.12%
• 1Y: 29.50%
• 3Y*: 11.74%
• 5Y*: 6.20%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 15.76%

SFLO

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 6.46%
• 6M: 25.77%
• YTD: 27.87%
• 1Y: 44.31%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 17.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
SFLO Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF	$4.38M	$3.53M	$2.43M
SIXS 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF	$407.40K	$305.33K	$173.24K

SIXS vs. SFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SIXS 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF	18.12%	4.59%	5.85%	1.54%
SFLO Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF	27.87%	11.88%	6.54%	0.27%

Correlation

The correlation between SIXS and SFLO is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 21, 2023	0.81

The correlation between SIXS and SFLO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

SIXS vs. SFLO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SIXS	SFLO
Financial Services	24.4%	0.2%
Healthcare	17.0%	16.3%
Utilities	11.5%	0.1%
Consumer Defensive	9.8%	6.1%
Real Estate	8.4%	0.1%
Industrials	7.5%	8.3%
Consumer Cyclical	6.6%	12.6%
Technology	6.3%	32.1%
Communication Services	5.3%	8.2%
Energy	2.1%	15.4%
Basic Materials	1.1%	0.8%

Return for Risk

SIXS vs. SFLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SIXS

SIXS Risk / Return Rank: 87
SIXS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
SIXS Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
SIXS Omega Ratio Rank: 83
SIXS Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
SIXS Martin Ratio Rank: 85

SFLO

SFLO Risk / Return Rank: 92
SFLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
SFLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
SFLO Omega Ratio Rank: 88
SFLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
SFLO Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SIXS vs. SFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF (SIXS) and Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF (SFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SIXS	SFLO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.06	2.30	-0.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.11	3.26	-0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.39	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.90	5.22	-1.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.03	17.48	-5.46

SIXS vs. SFLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIXS Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the SFLO Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIXS and SFLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SIXS vs. SFLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIXS drawdown since its inception was -27.68%, roughly equal to the maximum SFLO drawdown of -26.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXS and SFLO.

Drawdown Indicators

	SIXS	SFLO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.68%	-26.63%	-1.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.16%	-7.80%	+0.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.95%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.68%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.63%	-1.26%	-0.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.73%	-4.15%	-4.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.32%	2.33%	-0.01%

Volatility

SIXS vs. SFLO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF (SIXS) is 3.69%, while Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF (SFLO) has a volatility of 5.58%. This indicates that SIXS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SFLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SIXS	SFLO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.69%	5.58%	-1.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.34%	13.04%	-3.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.58%	17.73%	-4.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.50%	20.50%	-3.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.53%	20.50%	-0.97%

SIXS vs. SFLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIXS has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than SFLO's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

SIXS vs. SFLO - Dividend Comparison

SIXS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, more than SFLO's 0.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
SFLO Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF	0.72%	1.04%	1.28%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SIXS 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF	1.81%	1.62%	1.09%	1.60%	1.37%	0.94%	0.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SIXS and SFLO in my portfolio?

SIXS and SFLO have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SIXS or SFLO?

SFLO has higher volatility (5.58%) compared to SIXS (3.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIXS dropped -27.68% vs SFLO's -26.63%.

Which ETF is better, SIXS or SFLO?

On 1-year performance, SFLO leads with 44.31% vs 29.50% for SIXS. On fees, SFLO is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, SIXS has been the lower-risk option at 3.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SIXS or SFLO?

Over the 1-year period, SFLO has performed better with a 44.31% return vs 29.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SIXS or SFLO?

SFLO is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for SIXS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SIXS or SFLO?

SIXS has the higher dividend yield at 1.81%, compared with 0.72% for SFLO.

What is the main difference between SIXS and SFLO?

They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Victory. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for SIXS and 0.49% for SFLO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SFLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.