PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIXS vs. NUKZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SIXS vs. NUKZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF (SIXS) and Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SIXS vs. NUKZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SIXS
6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF
3.07%4.59%8.19%
NUKZ
Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF
3.57%56.57%62.98%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIXS achieves a 3.07% return, which is significantly lower than NUKZ's 3.57% return.


SIXS

1D
0.69%
1M
-4.11%
YTD
3.07%
6M
5.53%
1Y
13.19%
3Y*
9.29%
5Y*
3.80%
10Y*

NUKZ

1D
3.64%
1M
-10.35%
YTD
3.57%
6M
2.03%
1Y
74.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SIXS vs. NUKZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIXS has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than NUKZ's 0.85% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SIXS vs. NUKZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIXS
SIXS Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
SIXS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIXS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIXS Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
SIXS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIXS Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

NUKZ
NUKZ Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
NUKZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUKZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUKZ Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
NUKZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUKZ Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIXS vs. NUKZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF (SIXS) and Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SIXSNUKZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.80

2.35

-1.55

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.24

3.02

-1.78

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.38

-0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.19

4.34

-3.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.43

11.46

-7.03

SIXS vs. NUKZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIXS Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is lower than the NUKZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIXS and NUKZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SIXSNUKZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

2.35

-1.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

1.73

-1.03

Correlation

The correlation between SIXS and NUKZ is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

SIXS vs. NUKZ - Dividend Comparison

SIXS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, more than NUKZ's 0.88% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
SIXS
6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF
1.90%1.62%1.09%1.60%1.37%0.94%0.45%
NUKZ
Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF
0.88%0.91%0.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

SIXS vs. NUKZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIXS drawdown since its inception was -27.68%, smaller than the maximum NUKZ drawdown of -33.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXS and NUKZ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SIXSNUKZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.68%

-33.03%

+5.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.39%

-16.51%

+5.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.79%

-11.55%

+6.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.16%

-6.09%

-3.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.05%

6.25%

-3.20%

Volatility

SIXS vs. NUKZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF (SIXS) is 4.22%, while Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) has a volatility of 10.20%. This indicates that SIXS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NUKZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SIXSNUKZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.22%

10.20%

-5.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.39%

21.54%

-12.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.64%

31.75%

-15.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.79%

32.60%

-14.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.85%

32.60%

-12.75%