PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIXO vs. JULT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SIXO vs. JULT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Apr/Oct ETF (SIXO) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jul ETF (JULT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIXO achieves a 2.76% return, which is significantly lower than JULT's 5.89% return.


SIXO

1D
-0.14%
1M
1.31%
YTD
2.76%
6M
3.38%
1Y
9.31%
3Y*
9.69%
5Y*
10Y*

JULT

1D
-0.04%
1M
1.84%
YTD
5.89%
6M
6.68%
1Y
18.21%
3Y*
16.09%
5Y*
11.35%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIXO vs. JULT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SIXO
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Apr/Oct ETF
2.76%7.19%12.22%17.44%-5.66%3.65%
JULT
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jul ETF
5.89%13.73%17.43%21.34%-5.57%4.66%

Correlation

The correlation between SIXO and JULT is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2021

0.92

The correlation between SIXO and JULT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

SIXO vs. JULT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SIXO
JULT

Technology

36.2%
36.2%

Financial Services

11.9%
11.9%

Communication Services

10.9%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.4%
8.4%

Industrials

8.1%
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.9%

Energy

3.5%
3.5%

Utilities

2.3%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.8%

Technology

SIXO
36.2%
JULT
36.2%

Financial Services

SIXO
11.9%
JULT
11.9%

Communication Services

SIXO
10.9%
JULT
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

SIXO
10.1%
JULT
10.1%

Healthcare

SIXO
8.4%
JULT
8.4%

Industrials

SIXO
8.1%
JULT
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

SIXO
4.9%
JULT
4.9%

Energy

SIXO
3.5%
JULT
3.5%

Utilities

SIXO
2.3%
JULT
2.3%

Real Estate

SIXO
1.9%
JULT
1.9%

Basic Materials

SIXO
1.8%
JULT
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIXO vs. JULT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIXO
SIXO Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
SIXO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIXO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIXO Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
SIXO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIXO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

JULT
JULT Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
JULT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JULT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
JULT Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
JULT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
JULT Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIXO vs. JULT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Apr/Oct ETF (SIXO) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jul ETF (JULT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SIXOJULTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.52

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.26

3.50

-1.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.59

18.80

-10.20

SIXO vs. JULT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIXO Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the JULT Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIXO and JULT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SIXOJULTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

2.53

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

1.16

-0.29

Drawdowns

SIXO vs. JULT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIXO drawdown since its inception was -12.04%, smaller than the maximum JULT drawdown of -13.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXO and JULT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SIXOJULTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.04%

-13.57%

+1.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.13%

-5.22%

+1.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.95%

-13.57%

+1.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-0.04%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.01%

-1.78%

-0.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.09%

0.97%

+0.12%

Volatility

SIXO vs. JULT - Volatility Comparison

AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Apr/Oct ETF (SIXO) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jul ETF (JULT) have volatilities of 0.64% and 0.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SIXOJULTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.64%

0.63%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.06%

5.25%

-1.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.21%

7.25%

-2.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.08%

11.00%

-1.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.08%

10.49%

-1.41%

SIXO vs. JULT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SIXO and JULT have an expense ratio of 0.74%.


Dividends

SIXO vs. JULT - Dividend Comparison

Neither SIXO nor JULT has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
JULT
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jul ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.86%
SIXO
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Apr/Oct ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SIXO and JULT have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SIXO has higher volatility (0.64%) compared to JULT (0.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIXO dropped -12.04% vs JULT's -13.57%.

On 3-year performance, JULT leads with 16.09% vs 9.69% for SIXO. Both ETFs have the same 0.74% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, JULT has performed better with a 16.09% return vs 9.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SIXO and JULT have the same expense ratio: 0.74% per year.

SIXO and JULT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

JULT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIXO and JULT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer