PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JULT vs. ISWN
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

JULT vs. ISWN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jul ETF (JULT) and Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

JULT vs. ISWN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
JULT
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jul ETF
-2.04%13.73%17.43%21.34%-5.57%9.01%
ISWN
Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF
0.94%23.23%-3.96%8.19%-24.93%0.44%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JULT achieves a -2.04% return, which is significantly lower than ISWN's 0.94% return.


JULT

1D
2.00%
1M
-2.85%
YTD
-2.04%
6M
0.19%
1Y
14.92%
3Y*
14.55%
5Y*
9.82%
10Y*

ISWN

1D
2.06%
1M
-6.89%
YTD
0.94%
6M
3.42%
1Y
15.90%
3Y*
6.58%
5Y*
-0.01%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


JULT vs. ISWN - Expense Ratio Comparison

JULT has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than ISWN's 0.49% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

JULT vs. ISWN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JULT
JULT Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
JULT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JULT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
JULT Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
JULT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
JULT Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

ISWN
ISWN Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ISWN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISWN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISWN Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
ISWN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISWN Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JULT vs. ISWN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jul ETF (JULT) and Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JULTISWNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.21

1.35

-0.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.84

1.86

-0.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.24

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.76

1.61

+0.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.67

6.68

+2.98

JULT vs. ISWN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JULT Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is comparable to the ISWN Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JULT and ISWN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JULTISWNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.21

1.35

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

-0.00

+0.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.04

-0.04

+1.08

Correlation

The correlation between JULT and ISWN is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

JULT vs. ISWN - Dividend Comparison

JULT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ISWN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%.


TTM202520242023202220212020
JULT
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jul ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.86%
ISWN
Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF
2.91%2.89%3.27%2.91%2.00%0.76%0.00%

Drawdowns

JULT vs. ISWN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JULT drawdown since its inception was -13.57%, smaller than the maximum ISWN drawdown of -32.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JULT and ISWN.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


JULTISWNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.57%

-32.35%

+18.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.72%

-9.63%

+0.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.57%

-32.35%

+18.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.33%

-7.11%

+3.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.82%

-16.57%

+14.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

2.32%

-0.73%

Volatility

JULT vs. ISWN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jul ETF (JULT) is 3.66%, while Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN) has a volatility of 6.13%. This indicates that JULT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISWN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


JULTISWNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.66%

6.13%

-2.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.63%

8.60%

-2.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.35%

11.81%

+0.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.96%

11.47%

-0.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.60%

11.40%

-0.80%