JULT vs. AUGT
JULT (AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jul ETF) and AUGT (AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Aug ETF) are both Options Trading funds from Allianz. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, JULT returned 18.84% vs 19.45% for AUGT. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.74% expense ratio.
Performance
JULT vs. AUGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with JULT having a 6.27% return and AUGT slightly higher at 6.48%.
JULT
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.78%
- YTD
- 6.27%
- 6M
- 6.21%
- 1Y
- 18.84%
- 3Y*
- 15.61%
- 5Y*
- 11.40%
- 10Y*
- —
AUGT
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- YTD
- 6.48%
- 6M
- 6.33%
- 1Y
- 19.45%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JULT vs. AUGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
JULT AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jul ETF | 6.27% | 13.73% | 17.43% | 4.18% |
AUGT AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Aug ETF | 6.48% | 14.64% | 19.69% | 3.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between JULT and AUGT is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2023 | 0.97 |
The correlation between JULT and AUGT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JULT vs. AUGT — Risk / Return Rank
JULT
AUGT
JULT vs. AUGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jul ETF (JULT) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Aug ETF (AUGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JULT | AUGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.53 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.62 | 3.64 | -0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.62 | 18.87 | +0.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JULT vs. AUGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JULT drawdown since its inception was -13.57%, roughly equal to the maximum AUGT drawdown of -13.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JULT and AUGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JULT | AUGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.57% | -13.12% | -0.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.22% | -5.36% | +0.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.57% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.57% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.09% | +0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.76% | -1.22% | -0.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.96% | 1.03% | -0.07% |
Volatility
JULT vs. AUGT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jul ETF (JULT) is 0.96%, while AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Aug ETF (AUGT) has a volatility of 1.59%. This indicates that JULT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AUGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JULT | AUGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.96% | 1.59% | -0.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.23% | 5.60% | -0.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.99% | 7.43% | -0.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.02% | 10.14% | +0.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.45% | 10.14% | +0.31% |
JULT vs. AUGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both JULT and AUGT have an expense ratio of 0.74%.
Dividends
JULT vs. AUGT - Dividend Comparison
Neither JULT nor AUGT has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUGT AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Aug ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JULT AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jul ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, JULT and AUGT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
AUGT has higher volatility (1.59%) compared to JULT (0.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JULT dropped -13.57% vs AUGT's -13.12%.
On 1-year performance, AUGT leads with 19.45% vs 18.84% for JULT. Both ETFs have the same 0.74% expense ratio. On volatility, JULT has been the lower-risk option at 0.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AUGT has performed better with a 19.45% return vs 18.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JULT and AUGT have the same expense ratio: 0.74% per year.
JULT and AUGT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
JULT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 2.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JULT and AUGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer