SIXL vs. GRNJ
SIXL (ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF) and GRNJ (Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SIXL charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GRNJ.
Performance
SIXL vs. GRNJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIXL achieves a 3.41% return, which is significantly lower than GRNJ's 26.11% return.
SIXL
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -2.82%
- YTD
- 3.41%
- 6M
- 2.41%
- 1Y
- 3.64%
- 3Y*
- 7.60%
- 5Y*
- 3.45%
- 10Y*
- —
GRNJ
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- 8.92%
- YTD
- 26.11%
- 6M
- 25.03%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SIXL vs. GRNJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SIXL ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF | 3.41% | -0.58% |
GRNJ Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF | 26.11% | 5.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIXL and GRNJ is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIXL vs. GRNJ — Risk / Return Rank
SIXL
GRNJ
SIXL vs. GRNJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF (SIXL) and Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF (GRNJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SIXL | GRNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.56 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.58 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SIXL | GRNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 2.35 | -1.72 |
Drawdowns
SIXL vs. GRNJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIXL drawdown since its inception was -16.08%, smaller than the maximum GRNJ drawdown of -17.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXL and GRNJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIXL | GRNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.08% | -17.32% | +1.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.52% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.08% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.04% | -1.17% | -4.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.57% | -4.13% | -0.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.31% | — | — |
Volatility
SIXL vs. GRNJ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIXL | GRNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.36% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.61% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.50% | 29.93% | -20.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.14% | 29.93% | -17.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.55% | 29.93% | -17.38% |
SIXL vs. GRNJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIXL has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than GRNJ's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
SIXL vs. GRNJ - Dividend Comparison
SIXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, while GRNJ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRNJ Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SIXL ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF | 2.31% | 2.31% | 1.28% | 1.48% | 1.45% | 0.67% | 0.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SIXL and GRNJ have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SIXL is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SIXL is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GRNJ.
SIXL has the higher dividend yield at 2.31%, compared with 0.00% for GRNJ.
They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Fundstrat. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for SIXL and 0.75% for GRNJ.
Find the right allocation for SIXL and GRNJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer