SIXL vs. EQRR
SIXL (ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF) and EQRR (ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SIXL is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts, while EQRR is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq US Large Cap Equity Rising Rates Index. SIXL is actively managed, while EQRR is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SIXL returned 3.45%/yr vs 12.33%/yr for EQRR. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SIXL charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for EQRR.
Performance
SIXL vs. EQRR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIXL achieves a 3.41% return, which is significantly lower than EQRR's 27.33% return.
SIXL
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -2.82%
- YTD
- 3.41%
- 6M
- 2.41%
- 1Y
- 3.64%
- 3Y*
- 7.60%
- 5Y*
- 3.45%
- 10Y*
- —
EQRR
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 8.10%
- YTD
- 27.33%
- 6M
- 27.15%
- 1Y
- 41.70%
- 3Y*
- 22.28%
- 5Y*
- 12.33%
- 10Y*
- —
SIXL vs. EQRR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIXL ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF | 3.41% | -0.61% | 14.13% | 2.38% | -7.49% | 20.00% | 18.42% |
EQRR ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF | 27.33% | 15.49% | 7.69% | 9.19% | 2.20% | 36.11% | 40.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIXL and EQRR is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2020 | 0.56 |
The correlation between SIXL and EQRR shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.60 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SIXL vs. EQRR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SIXL
EQRR
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Energy
Utilities
SIXL
EQRR
-
Consumer Defensive
SIXL
EQRR
-
Financial Services
SIXL
EQRR
Healthcare
SIXL
EQRR
-
Real Estate
SIXL
EQRR
-
Consumer Cyclical
SIXL
EQRR
Industrials
SIXL
EQRR
Communication Services
SIXL
EQRR
Technology
SIXL
EQRR
Basic Materials
SIXL
EQRR
-
Energy
SIXL
EQRR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIXL vs. EQRR — Risk / Return Rank
SIXL
EQRR
SIXL vs. EQRR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF (SIXL) and ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF (EQRR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SIXL | EQRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.56 | -0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.56 | 8.47 | -7.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.58 | 31.54 | -29.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SIXL | EQRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 | 3.11 | -2.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.58 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.43 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
SIXL vs. EQRR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIXL drawdown since its inception was -16.08%, smaller than the maximum EQRR drawdown of -57.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXL and EQRR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIXL | EQRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.08% | -57.93% | +41.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.52% | -4.95% | -1.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.65% | -17.75% | +6.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.08% | -21.75% | +5.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.04% | -0.58% | -5.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.57% | -10.08% | +5.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.31% | 1.33% | +0.98% |
Volatility
SIXL vs. EQRR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF (SIXL) is 2.36%, while ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF (EQRR) has a volatility of 4.72%. This indicates that SIXL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EQRR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIXL | EQRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.36% | 4.72% | -2.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.61% | 10.35% | -3.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.50% | 13.50% | -4.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.14% | 21.39% | -9.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.55% | 24.87% | -12.32% |
SIXL vs. EQRR - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIXL has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than EQRR's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SIXL vs. EQRR - Dividend Comparison
SIXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, more than EQRR's 1.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQRR ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF | 1.20% | 1.70% | 2.17% | 2.77% | 2.34% | 1.71% | 2.17% | 2.05% | 2.47% | 0.69% |
SIXL ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF | 2.31% | 2.31% | 1.28% | 1.48% | 1.45% | 0.67% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SIXL and EQRR have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EQRR has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to SIXL (2.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIXL dropped -16.08% vs EQRR's -57.93%.
On 5-year performance, EQRR leads with 12.33% vs 3.45% for SIXL. On fees, EQRR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, SIXL has been the lower-risk option at 2.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EQRR has performed better with a 12.33% return vs 3.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EQRR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for SIXL.
SIXL has the higher dividend yield at 2.31%, compared with 1.20% for EQRR.
SIXL is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while EQRR is Mid Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for SIXL and 0.35% for EQRR.
EQRR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.11 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SIXL and EQRR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer