SIXL vs. DRES

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

SIXL (ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF) and DRES (GMO Domestic Resilience ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.41 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SIXL charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for DRES.

Performance

SIXL vs. DRES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF (SIXL) and GMO Domestic Resilience ETF (DRES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIXL achieves a 11.76% return, which is significantly lower than DRES's 21.60% return.

SIXL

• 1D: -0.57%
• 1M: 0.20%
• 6M: 6.85%
• YTD: 11.76%
• 1Y: 14.10%
• 3Y*: 9.10%
• 5Y*: 4.75%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.03%

DRES

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: 0.31%
• 6M: 12.48%
• YTD: 21.60%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DRES GMO Domestic Resilience ETF	$93.72K	$76.15K	$99.36K
SIXL ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF	$85.49K	$51.42K	$104.59K

SIXL vs. DRES - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SIXL ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF	11.76%	-1.55%
DRES GMO Domestic Resilience ETF	21.60%	2.50%

Correlation

The correlation between SIXL and DRES is 0.41, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025	0.41

Return for Risk

SIXL vs. DRES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SIXL

SIXL Risk / Return Rank: 55
SIXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
SIXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
SIXL Omega Ratio Rank: 53
SIXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
SIXL Martin Ratio Rank: 49

DRES

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SIXL vs. DRES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF (SIXL) and GMO Domestic Resilience ETF (DRES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SIXL	DRES	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.33	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.02	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.12	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.72	—	—

Drawdowns

SIXL vs. DRES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIXL drawdown since its inception was -16.08%, which is greater than DRES's maximum drawdown of -10.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXL and DRES.

Drawdown Indicators

	SIXL	DRES	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.08%	-10.41%	-5.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.52%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.65%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.08%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.97%	-1.59%	-0.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.49%	-2.14%	-2.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.41%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SIXL	DRES	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.24%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.92%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.43%	18.07%	-7.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.31%	18.07%	-5.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.60%	18.07%	-5.47%

SIXL vs. DRES - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIXL has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than DRES's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

SIXL vs. DRES - Dividend Comparison

SIXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, more than DRES's 0.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DRES GMO Domestic Resilience ETF	0.52%	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SIXL ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF	2.19%	2.31%	1.28%	1.48%	1.45%	0.67%	0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SIXL and DRES in my portfolio?

SIXL and DRES have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SIXL or DRES?

On fees, SIXL is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SIXL or DRES?

SIXL is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DRES.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SIXL or DRES?

SIXL has the higher dividend yield at 2.19%, compared with 0.52% for DRES.

What is the main difference between SIXL and DRES?

They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and GMO. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for SIXL and 0.50% for DRES.