PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIXH vs. FLLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SIXH vs. FLLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH) and Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF (FLLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIXH achieves a 7.20% return, which is significantly lower than FLLV's 13.04% return.


SIXH

1D
0.48%
1M
-0.21%
YTD
7.20%
6M
8.70%
1Y
10.61%
3Y*
12.22%
5Y*
8.95%
10Y*

FLLV

1D
-0.76%
1M
2.34%
YTD
13.04%
6M
14.26%
1Y
26.92%
3Y*
17.11%
5Y*
11.11%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIXH vs. FLLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SIXH
6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF
7.20%9.47%12.06%4.93%6.90%18.37%5.83%
FLLV
Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF
13.04%15.92%10.70%13.87%-8.54%23.36%23.01%

Correlation

The correlation between SIXH and FLLV is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2020

0.60

The correlation between SIXH and FLLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

SIXH vs. FLLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SIXH
FLLV

Consumer Defensive

23.2%
6.1%

Technology

20.2%
28.8%

Communication Services

13.3%
7.8%

Healthcare

12.6%
11.6%

Financial Services

9.7%
13.0%

Industrials

7.8%
9.6%

Consumer Cyclical

6.8%
11.0%

Utilities

5.0%
2.6%

Real Estate

1.4%
2.5%

Energy

0.1%
4.4%

Basic Materials

0.1%
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

SIXH
23.2%
FLLV
6.1%

Technology

SIXH
20.2%
FLLV
28.8%

Communication Services

SIXH
13.3%
FLLV
7.8%

Healthcare

SIXH
12.6%
FLLV
11.6%

Financial Services

SIXH
9.7%
FLLV
13.0%

Industrials

SIXH
7.8%
FLLV
9.6%

Consumer Cyclical

SIXH
6.8%
FLLV
11.0%

Utilities

SIXH
5.0%
FLLV
2.6%

Real Estate

SIXH
1.4%
FLLV
2.5%

Energy

SIXH
0.1%
FLLV
4.4%

Basic Materials

SIXH
0.1%
FLLV
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIXH vs. FLLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIXH
SIXH Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
SIXH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIXH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIXH Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
SIXH Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIXH Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

FLLV
FLLV Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FLLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLLV Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
FLLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLLV Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIXH vs. FLLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH) and Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF (FLLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SIXHFLLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.61

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

5.52

-3.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.25

20.83

-14.57

SIXH vs. FLLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIXH Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is lower than the FLLV Sharpe Ratio of 3.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIXH and FLLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SIXHFLLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

3.26

-1.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

0.84

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.05

0.84

+0.22

Drawdowns

SIXH vs. FLLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIXH drawdown since its inception was -11.68%, smaller than the maximum FLLV drawdown of -33.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXH and FLLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SIXHFLLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.68%

-33.95%

+22.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.36%

-4.90%

+0.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.10%

-14.01%

+4.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.68%

-18.40%

+6.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.42%

-0.76%

-1.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.85%

-3.25%

+1.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.70%

1.30%

+0.40%

Volatility

SIXH vs. FLLV - Volatility Comparison

6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH) has a higher volatility of 2.31% compared to Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF (FLLV) at 2.02%. This indicates that SIXH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SIXHFLLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.31%

2.02%

+0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.02%

5.96%

+0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.60%

8.32%

-0.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.37%

13.27%

-2.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.15%

15.69%

-5.54%

SIXH vs. FLLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIXH has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than FLLV's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

SIXH vs. FLLV - Dividend Comparison

SIXH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, less than FLLV's 4.73% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FLLV
Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF
4.73%4.71%3.25%1.75%1.68%1.41%1.40%1.31%1.55%1.44%0.50%
SIXH
6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF
1.90%2.23%1.55%2.04%2.06%1.65%1.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SIXH and FLLV have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SIXH has higher volatility (2.31%) compared to FLLV (2.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIXH dropped -11.68% vs FLLV's -33.95%.

On 5-year performance, FLLV leads with 11.11% vs 8.95% for SIXH. On fees, FLLV is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FLLV has been the lower-risk option at 2.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLLV has performed better with a 11.11% return vs 8.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLLV is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for SIXH.

FLLV has the higher dividend yield at 4.73%, compared with 1.90% for SIXH.

They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for SIXH and 0.29% for FLLV.

FLLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.26 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIXH and FLLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer