PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JANB vs. RB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JANB vs. RB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus January Buffer ETF (JANB) and ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (RB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JANB achieves a 5.85% return, which is significantly lower than RB's 8.48% return.


JANB

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.35%
YTD
5.85%
6M
6.03%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RB

1D
0.70%
1M
1.98%
YTD
8.48%
6M
8.15%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JANB vs. RB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JANB and RB is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2025

0.58

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JANB vs. RB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus January Buffer ETF (JANB) and ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (RB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

JANB vs. RB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JANB vs. RB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JANB drawdown since its inception was -6.52%, which is greater than RB's maximum drawdown of -2.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JANB and RB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JANBRBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.52%

-2.09%

-4.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

0.00%

-0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.10%

-0.44%

-0.66%

Volatility

JANB vs. RB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JANBRBDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.50%

6.56%

+0.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.50%

6.56%

+0.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.50%

6.56%

+0.94%

JANB vs. RB - Expense Ratio Comparison

JANB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than RB's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

JANB vs. RB - Dividend Comparison

JANB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%.


Frequently Asked Questions


JANB and RB have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JANB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JANB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for RB.

RB has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 0.00% for JANB.

They also come from different issuers: Aptus Capital Advisors and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for JANB and 0.58% for RB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JANB and RB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer